Htcat Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to htcat

stargz-snapshotter

10 1,040 8.6 Go htcat VS stargz-snapshotter

Fast container image distribution plugin with lazy pulling
paginator

0 4 0.0 Go htcat VS paginator

A simple package to paginate your data in Go. (by yassinouider)
InfluxDB

www.influxdata.com sponsored

Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
gron

0 1,013 0.0 Go htcat VS gron

gron, Cron Jobs in Go. (by roylee0704)
gohper

0 253 0.0 Go htcat VS gohper
gopencils

0 451 0.0 Go htcat VS gopencils

Easily consume REST APIs with Go (golang)
fastlz

0 13 0.0 C htcat VS fastlz

Wrap over FastLz for GoLang
delve

52 22,012 9.2 Go htcat VS delve

Delve is a debugger for the Go programming language.
WorkOS

workos.com sponsored

The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
command

0 14 0.0 Go htcat VS command

Discontinued Command pattern for Go with thread safe serial and parallel dispatcher
jump

4 1,731 2.9 Go htcat VS jump

Jump helps you navigate faster by learning your habits. ✌️
peco

6 7,571 4.7 Go htcat VS peco

Simplistic interactive filtering tool
goreleaser

59 12,995 9.8 Go htcat VS goreleaser

Deliver Go binaries as fast and easily as possible

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better htcat alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to htcat

htcat reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of htcat. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-02-01.

Speeding up LXC container pull by up to 3x
2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 1 Feb 2022

https://github.com/htcat/htcat) to assist with Heroku's efforts to speed up moving the tar formatted application releases around. It's pretty old, it doesn't integrate tar archival itself, it probably can stand improvement (or given its small size, even a rewrite).
My favorite hack in there (that also made it work with pre-signed S3 urls) was not using the HEAD method as is customary to determine object sizes, but instead doing a regular "GET" that, for small files, would execute on its own...but for larger would simply be abruptly closed by htcat once it reached the bytes that had since been fetched in parallel by a range-based request sent immediately afterwards. The goal was to have htcat not offer a penalty on small files so it could be used on blended workloads without thinking.
It also found a bug in S3's range implementation. We had a problem with some object or other, I wrote in about it, and was told that upon investigation a bug had been fixed. No more problem.