Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR. Learn more →
Hpy Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to hpy
-
-
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
-
-
MicroPython
MicroPython - a lean and efficient Python implementation for microcontrollers and constrained systems
-
-
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
-
cinder
Cinder is Meta's internal performance-oriented production version of CPython. (by facebookincubator)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pyston
(No longer maintained) A faster and highly-compatible implementation of the Python programming language.
-
-
falcon
The no-magic web API and microservices framework for Python developers, with an emphasis on reliability and performance at scale.
-
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
NOTE:
The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives.
Hence, a higher number means a better hpy alternative or higher similarity.
hpy discussion
hpy reviews and mentions
Posts with mentions or reviews of hpy.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-10-05.
- HPy – A better C API for Python
-
The Alternative Implementation Problem
> numpy (and swig) predates Unladen Swallow
Sure, but that’s not what I said. Numpy is surprisingly old, but (at least according to my own impressions at the time) in 2010 supporting it was in no way table stakes for an “alternative” implementation of Python. Hell, Jython was still occasionally taken seriously then, and Microsoft still pretended they cared about IronPython.
> I would suggest the C API is just as much a part of Python as the standard library
As things stand, yes, no question.
The problem is, it was never designed that way. In particular, it cannot (or at least not designed to) support any other memory management strategy but CPython’s, thus efforts like HPy[1]. For example, while the language docs admonish you not to depend on __del__ running at any particular moment, if we consider the Python/C API a part of the language, then the language has to behave as though it uses eager reference counting and occasionally runs a cycle collector. And that’s the easy case—think about how deeply the GIL is rooted there.
That is good design for something that’s part of the language, as it effectively is. It was never intended to be and never received commensurate amounts of care. It just turned out that way—and ain’t that a sad thing to admit.
[1] http://hpyproject.org/
-
RustPython
There is a merge request up to add autogen rust bindings to hpy
https://github.com/hpyproject/hpy/pull/457
-
Ruby 3.2’s YJIT is Production-Ready
Are you referencing https://github.com/hpyproject/hpy?
I do hope it takes off.
- HPy - A better C API for Python
-
Codon: A high-performance Python compiler
The HPy project [0] seems like a promising way out of this.
[0] https://hpyproject.org/
-
New record breaking for Python in TechEmPower
socketify.py breaks the record for Python no other Python WebFramework/Server as able to reach 6.2 mi requests per second before in TechEmPower Benchmarks, this puts Python at the same level of performance that Golang, Rust and C++ for web development, in fact Golang got 5.2 mi req/s in this same round. Almost every server or web framework tries to use JIT to boost the performance, but only socketify.py deliveries this level of performance, and even without JIT socketify.py is twice as fast any other web framework/server in active development, and still can be much more optimized using HPy (https://hpyproject.org/). Python will get even faster and faster in future!
-
Is it time to leave Python behind? (My personal rant)
I think Propose a better messaging for Python is the option and a lot of languages will learn it from Rust, because rust erros are the best described errors I see in my life lol. Cargo is amazing and I think we will need a better poetry/pip for sure, HPy project will modernize extensions and packages 📦 too https://hpyproject.org/
-
A Look on Python Web Performance at the end of 2022
It also show that PyPy3 will not magically boost your performance, you need to integrate in a manner that PyPy3 can optimize and delivery CPU performance, with a more complex example maybe it can help more. But why socketify is so much faster using PyPy3? The answer is CFFI, socketify did not use Cython for integration and cannot delivery the full performance on Python3, this will be solved with HPy.
-
socketify.py - Bringing WebSockets, Http/Https High Peformance servers for PyPy3 and Python3
HPy integration to better support CPython, PyPy and GraalPython
-
A note from our sponsor - CodeRabbit
coderabbit.ai | 20 Mar 2025
Stats
Basic hpy repo stats
24
1,104
7.3
28 days ago
hpyproject/hpy is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of hpy is Python.
Sponsored
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers
Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
coderabbit.ai