- github-action-tester VS turnstyle
- github-action-tester VS actions-runner-controller
- github-action-tester VS xmonad
- github-action-tester VS gitlab
- github-action-tester VS jenkins-std-lib
- github-action-tester VS act
- github-action-tester VS test-ci-needs
- github-action-tester VS actions-runner-
- github-action-tester VS roadmap
- github-action-tester VS cache
Github-action-tester Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to github-action-tester
-
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
xmonad
The core of xmonad, a small but functional ICCCM-compliant tiling window manager
-
-
-
actions-runner-controller
Kubernetes controller for GitHub Actions self-hosted runners
-
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
-
github-action-tester reviews and mentions
-
GitHub Actions Limitations and Gotchas
To be honest I've always found the best approach with most of these systems is to checking your magic as shell-scripts inside your repository.
Then you're much much more portable. Want to run tests? Run ".ci/tests.sh", want to generate artifacts "make", or ".ci/build.sh".
All systems, be they github actions, jenkins, gitlab-runners, and everything else allow you to clone/update your repository and run something from within it. Which keeps things mostly portable.
I put together a simple github action a long time ago, but now of course I realize it is overkill:
Stats
The primary programming language of github-action-tester is Shell.