Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR. Learn more →
Manifold Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to manifold
-
-
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
-
-
-
-
manim
A community-maintained Python framework for creating mathematical animations. (by ManimCommunity)
-
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
gcodepreview
OpenPythonSCAD library for moving a tool in lines and arcs so as to model how a part would be cut using G-Code or described as a DXF.
-
Graphite
2D vector & raster editor that melds traditional layers & tools with a modern node-based, non-destructive, procedural workflow.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
manifold discussion
manifold reviews and mentions
-
CADmium: A Local-First CAD Program Built for the Browser
Why in a browser if it's local-first?
Solvespace has the benefit of being a single download/executable.
It also has a constraint solver which has been used in a couple of projects: CADsketcher as you noted, and Dune 3D: https://github.com/dune3d/dune3d where the author noted:
>I ended up directly using solvespace's solver instead of the suggested wrapper code since it didn't expose all of the features I needed. I also had to patch the solver to make it sufficiently fast for the kinds of equations I was generating by symbolically solving equations where applicable.
Any relation to: https://github.com/jay3sh/cadmium ?
Also, for CAD kernels, Manifold was not mentioned: https://github.com/elalish/manifold/wiki/Manifold-Library --- while I understand it to have many of the same disadvantages as OpenCASCADE, it does seem worth mentioning.
Interestingly the kernel was previously discussed here:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35071317
It seems really interesting/promising, esp. the compleat history and editability (I'd love to see that history listed in a pane which could be opened/closed --- add a series of disclosure triangles which would allow hiding finished elements so that one could focus on the current task and it would be a dream come true for me --- if I can puzzle out the 3D stuff, so far I've crashed and burned on all the apps I've tried (BRL-CAD, FreeCAD, Solvespace, Alibre Atom...) --- the only thing I've been successful w/ is OpenSCAD and similar coding tools).
-
PicoGK is a compact and robust geometry kernel for Computational Engineering
Small in a relative sense compared to some larger codebase.
Here's a bit on Manifold:
https://github.com/elalish/manifold/wiki/Manifold-Library
and the author's blog is interesting:
https://elalish.blogspot.com/search/label/Manifold
-
3D and 2D: Testing out my cross-platform graphics engine
For cad kernels I highly recommend manifold https://github.com/elalish/manifold
- OpenSCAD Survey - What should be improved ?
-
C++: The Most Important Complexities
Our project https://github.com/elalish/manifold made use of this to speed up mesh processing algorithms a lot.
-
Text-to-CAD: Risks and Opportunities
Wondering why no BRep support means it is not a CAD. It seems that OpenVSP doesn't use BRep but uses parametric surface [1]. I wonder if mesh-based modeling + some constraints solving will get you a CAD, or are there other requirements that I don't know? I only work on mesh processing library on my free-time and I don't know much about BRep.
[1] https://github.com/elalish/manifold/discussions/549#discussi...
-
My Unhealthy Relationship with Keyboards ⌨
Unhealthy relationship with keyboards? Comparing with the r/MechanicalKeyboards or r/ErgoMechKeyboards people this relationship is more like divorced...
I added python binding and ended up being on of the devs for https://github.com/elalish/manifold because OpenSCAD is too slow for my modeling (I am quite impatient). Optimizing my keyboard for months with more than 5 complete rebuilds to optimize my design (looks like this: https://i.redd.it/xtf0f54mt7ya1.jpg), and is afraid of open sourcing it because my code looks too bad :(
-
OpenSCAD's Web Playground got upgraded (still Alpha)
Now much faster and more stable thanks to the Manifold engine (https://github.com/elalish/manifold): in fact it is often faster than the last stable desktop release from https://openscad.org/.
Also much better code completion, and ships with a few examples from the various bundled libraries to get you started.
- Manifold Geometry library for topological robustness
-
When I place down a CSGPolygon3D in this shape (haven't tried other shapes) it always opens a portal to hell, and it's not just in the editor, it's in the game too. Does anyone know what I can do about this?
At the end, they gonna replace it with ( elalish manifold.
-
A note from our sponsor - CodeRabbit
coderabbit.ai | 8 Nov 2024
Stats
elalish/manifold is an open source project licensed under Apache License 2.0 which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of manifold is C++.