crdt-benchmarks

A collection of CRDT benchmarks (by dmonad)

Crdt-benchmarks Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to crdt-benchmarks

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better crdt-benchmarks alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to crdt-benchmarks

Reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of crdt-benchmarks. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-10.
  • Automerge: a new foundation for collaboration software [video]
    13 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 10 Dec 2021
  • Show HN: SyncedStore CRDT – build multiplayer collaborative apps for React / Vue
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 8 Dec 2021
  • 5000x Faster CRDTs: An Adventure in Optimization
    8 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 31 Jul 2021
    Cool! It'd be interesting to see those CRDT implementations added to Kevin Jahns' CRDT Benchmarks page[1]. The LogootSplit paper looks interesting. It looks like xray is abandoned, and I'm not sure about teletype. Though teletype's CRDT looks to be entirely implemented in javascript[2]? If the authors are around I'd love to see some benchmarks so we can compare approaches and learn what actually works well.

    And I'm not surprised these techniques have been invented before. Realising a tree is an appropriate data structure here is a pretty obvious step if you have a mind for data structures.

    To name it, I often find myself feeling defensive when people read my work and respond with a bunch of links to academic papers. Its probably totally unfair and a complete projection from my side, but I hear a voice in my head reword your comment to instead say something awful like: "Cool, but everything you did was done before. Even if they didn't make any of their work practical, usable or good they still published first and you obviously didn't do a good enough literature review if you didn't know that." And I feel an unfair defensiveness arise in me as a result that wants to find excuses to dismiss the work, even if the work might be otherwise interesting.

    Its hard to compare their benchmark results because they used synthetic randomized editing traces, which always have different performance profiles than real edits for this stuff. Their own university gathered some great real world data in an earlier study. It would have been much more instructive if that data set was used here. At a glance their RAM usage looks to be about 2 orders of magnitude worse than diamond-types or yjs. And their CPU usage... ?? I can't tell because they have no tables of results. Just some hard to read charts with log scales, so you can't even really eyeball the figures. So its really hard to tell if their work ends up performance-competitive without spending a couple days getting their enterprise style java code running with a better data set. Do you think thats worth doing?

    [1] https://github.com/dmonad/crdt-benchmarks

    [2] https://github.com/atom/teletype-crdt

    8 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 31 Jul 2021

Stats

Basic crdt-benchmarks repo stats
4
205
3.7
4 months ago

dmonad/crdt-benchmarks is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 or later which is an OSI approved license.

Deliver Cleaner and Safer Code - Right in Your IDE of Choice!
SonarLint is a free and open source IDE extension that identifies and catches bugs and vulnerabilities as you code, directly in the IDE. Install from your favorite IDE marketplace today.
www.sonarlint.org
Find remote JavaScript jobs at our new job board 99remotejobs.com. There are 16 new remote jobs listed recently.
Are you hiring? Post a new remote job listing for free.