SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Conductor Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to Conductor
-
-
-
Onboard AI
Learn any GitHub repo in 59 seconds. Onboard AI learns any GitHub repo in minutes and lets you chat with it to locate functionality, understand different parts, and generate new code. Use it for free at www.getonboard.dev.
-
-
android-common
Android common lib, include ImageCache, HttpCache, DropDownListView, DownloadManager, Utils and so on
-
Elf Framework
Efl is an Android Framework to simplify the android development process (by fenli)
-
-
InfluxDB
Collect and Analyze Billions of Data Points in Real Time. Manage all types of time series data in a single, purpose-built database. Run at any scale in any environment in the cloud, on-premises, or at the edge.
-
simple-stack
[ACTIVE] Simple Stack, a backstack library / navigation framework for simpler navigation and state management (for fragments, views, or whatevers).
-
UltimateAndroid
UltimateAndroid is a rapid development framework for developing your apps
-
compose-destinations
Annotation processing library for type-safe Jetpack Compose navigation with no boilerplate.
-
Decompose
Kotlin Multiplatform lifecycle-aware business logic components (aka BLoCs) with routing (navigation) and pluggable UI (Jetpack Compose, SwiftUI, JS React, etc.)
-
workflow
A Swift and Kotlin library for making composable state machines, and UIs driven by those state machines. (by square)
-
scoop
:icecream: micro framework for building view based modular Android applications. (by lyft)
-
workflow-kotlin
A Swift and Kotlin library for making composable state machines, and UIs driven by those state machines.
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
Conductor reviews and mentions
-
Single Activity Apps: Fragments vs Views in 2022
I don't have much experience with conductor, so I'm curious what your concerns about lifecycle is lacking compared to fragments? But if your team already knows that framework I might just stick with views over fragments. I see there is a compose integration if you do ever plan on picking that up with conductor. Otherwise compose makes fragments obsolete and your team already knows conductor. I do agree the navigation story in compose is not mature especially after jetpack compose navigation. But there are other 3rd party libraries like compose destinations or decompose, but would be nice to see something better 1st party.
The last enterprise level app we put together was in 2018; we chose to go with Conductor and run with custom views and minimal activities. The codebase has been a pleasure to maintain and apart from some boilerplate here and there, a Single Activity, Multiple View app has filled all our requirements.
-
Single Activity architecture with custom views. Common pattern or anti-pattern?
I don't know how common/popular it actually is, but it's definitely not uncommon. Square has been doing this kind of home-made navigation for quite a while as far as I know (most recently in the form of workflow-kotlin), Lyft (Scoop) as well, and more (e.g. Conductor).
- What are the current best alternative libraries to Jetpack Navigation Component which preserve state and backstack and work with Bottom Navigation?
-
A note from our sponsor - #<SponsorshipServiceOld:0x00007f0f9b4380d0>
www.saashub.com | 10 Dec 2023
Stats
bluelinelabs/Conductor is an open source project licensed under Apache License 2.0 which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of Conductor is Java.