SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Blog.rust-lang.org Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to blog.rust-lang.org
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
xidel
Command line tool to download and extract data from HTML/XML pages or JSON-APIs, using CSS, XPath 3.0, XQuery 3.0, JSONiq or pattern matching. It can also create new or transformed XML/HTML/JSON documents.
-
-
-
-
blog.rust-lang.org discussion
blog.rust-lang.org reviews and mentions
-
Should atomics be unsafe?
Historically, such serious bugs get communicated broadly and addressed very quickly via security advisory blog posts and on https://rustsec.org.
-
The first issue of Rust Magazine has been published 🎉🎉
This font gets double-bolded :D – Alfa Slab One is already bold, and then font-weight: 800 makes the browser "bold it even more". Rust blog also had the same issue. So instead of dimming the font-weight of titles, you should instead just tell the browser that Alfa Slab One is already bold:
- New video! 2022 in Programming Languages
-
Security advisory for Cargo (CVE-2022-46176)
Indeed! Thanks for pointing this out, I just opened a PR to mention the additional mitigation.
-
Announcing Rust 1.66.0
You're correct that there's currently no language-level way to get at the raw discriminant in this case, you need to use unsafe and inspect the discriminant directly. I agree that the blog post should mention this limitation, here's a PR to fix it: https://github.com/rust-lang/blog.rust-lang.org/pull/1056
-
Anything C can do Rust can do Better
Do you want to stay up to date? The official blog, This Week in Rust, This Week in Rust Docs, The official reddit
-
Can someone recommend good blogs about Rust?
The official Rust blogs are actually pretty good: https://blog.rust-lang.org/
-
About political messages on the Rust blog.
Note that "separate" is not obviously correct to me. The statement about Iran was added to the release announcement via discussion from the "leadership chat,", and my understanding is that the leadership chat contains "project directors on the Rust Foundation board".
-
Rust 1.65.0
As a Rust team member, I have no earthly clue. Maybe it's the Core team? Or the blog author? Or the release team? Also no clue whatsoever as to the process for determining which cause to promote or even which causes are not allowed to be promoted (if any?).
The blog is on github, and this is the commit that added it: https://github.com/rust-lang/blog.rust-lang.org/pull/1043/co...
What is the "leadership chat"? See: https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2022/10/06/governance...
(I had thought the "leadership chat" was supposed to be a temporary group working to resolve a governance problem precipitated by the mod team resignation last year (of which I was a member), but it appears to be a decision making body at this point.)
-
Announcing Rust 1.65.0
No, I don't think so. And as far as I can tell, this wasn't made by the release team, but by the leadership chat.
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 4 Oct 2024
Stats
rust-lang/blog.rust-lang.org is an open source project licensed under Apache License 2.0 which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of blog.rust-lang.org is HTML.
Popular Comparisons
- blog.rust-lang.org VS rust-anthology
- blog.rust-lang.org VS Exercism - website
- blog.rust-lang.org VS xidel
- blog.rust-lang.org VS jsoup
- blog.rust-lang.org VS tour_of_rust
- blog.rust-lang.org VS yq
- blog.rust-lang.org VS lol-html
- blog.rust-lang.org VS xmlq
- blog.rust-lang.org VS pup
- blog.rust-lang.org VS cascadia