SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Awesome-wasm-runtimes Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to awesome-wasm-runtimes
-
-
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
-
zig
General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software.
-
-
Nim
Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula. Its design focuses on efficiency, expressiveness, and elegance (in that order of priority).
-
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
Graal
GraalVM compiles Java applications into native executables that start instantly, scale fast, and use fewer compute resources 🚀
-
-
TinyGo
Go compiler for small places. Microcontrollers, WebAssembly (WASM/WASI), and command-line tools. Based on LLVM.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
NOTE:
The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives.
Hence, a higher number means a better awesome-wasm-runtimes alternative or higher similarity.
awesome-wasm-runtimes reviews and mentions
Posts with mentions or reviews of awesome-wasm-runtimes.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-10-04.
-
Extism Makes WebAssembly Easy
Firecracker is a fine technology, but serverless companies have started taking advantage Wasm's faster start-up times for use cases of running Wasm on the server (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqgCxhPAao0). The deny by default security policy makes Wasm a great choice to run your code in isolation, particularly for maximizing hardware resources in the multi-tenant environments these serverless companies operate.
In the past few years, we have seen more use cases of Wasm emerge outside of the browser. JavaScript engines are now just a fraction of the total number of runtimes available. Wasmtime, Wasmer, WasmEdge, wazero are popular ones for non-browser use cases like blockchain, serverless, and edge computing (although Cloudflare uses V8's Wasm engine). WAMR is a popular one for cyber physical/IoT devices. There's a nice list here: https://github.com/appcypher/awesome-wasm-runtimes
-
I think [...] the "future of computing" is going to be [...] CISC. I’ve read of IBM mainframes that have [hardware instructions for] parsing XML [...]; if you had garbage collection, bounds checking, and type checking in hardware, you’d have fewer and smaller instructions that achieved just as much.
There's plenty of other ways to interact with Wasm, most of which are secure. (Wasmtime is the one I'm most familiar with, which is why I linked to it.)
-
Lunatic is an Erlang-inspired runtime for WebAssembly
Yeah, this is one of many non-browser runtimes, e.g. see https://github.com/appcypher/awesome-wasm-runtimes
Lunatic is more opinionated than most of these or node, though, in that it's trying to emulate a particular concurrent system design pattern borrowed from Erlang/BEAM.
-
Web Assembly OS guidance
There's an overview of different WASM runtimes with features: https://github.com/appcypher/awesome-wasm-runtimes
- Wasmer – The Universal WebAssembly Runtime
-
What to learn in 2022
Now, the creation Bytecode Alliance, the development of multiple WebAssembly runtimes and the work of the W3C WebAssembly Community Group is why I belive it will get popular, but the capability-based security model is why I want it to get popular.
-
Ho Ho Ho, WasmEdge 0.9.0 is here!
⚖ I think it's really cool that a plugin author could compile their C++ to .wasm such that a single plugin binary can run on either Linux or Windows (don't need an x86 .dll, x64 .dll, x86 .so, x64 .so...) and in a sandbox (no arbitrary syscalls or Win32 calls, just the interfaces given to it), while still getting near native AOT speed. Though, it's hard to judge which one to choose from now with all the wasm engines that are available (https://github.com/appcypher/awesome-wasm-runtimes), with wasmtime or inNative being two others I've considered for my project. I'll definitely look into this one though, given it supports many of the newer proposals.
-
Why WebAssembly is innovative even outside the browser
Numerous native runtimes for webassembly already exist[0], with the current popular choices apparently being Wasmer[1] and Wasmtime[2].
All one would need to do (AFAIK) is ship a client for all major platforms, as is done with Electron (and web browsers themselves, and everything else.)
[0]https://github.com/appcypher/awesome-wasm-runtimes
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 24 Apr 2024
Stats
Basic awesome-wasm-runtimes repo stats
8
1,271
1.9
about 2 months ago
Popular Comparisons
- awesome-wasm-runtimes VS wasmer
- awesome-wasm-runtimes VS Graal
- awesome-wasm-runtimes VS Odin
- awesome-wasm-runtimes VS wasm-micro-runtime
- awesome-wasm-runtimes VS TinyGo
- awesome-wasm-runtimes VS Nim
- awesome-wasm-runtimes VS hn-search
- awesome-wasm-runtimes VS watt
- awesome-wasm-runtimes VS rusty-wacc-viewer
- awesome-wasm-runtimes VS cap-std
Sponsored
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com