SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
ActiveRecord Where Assoc Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to ActiveRecord Where Assoc
Ruby JSON Schema Validator
Ruby JSON Schema Validator (by voxpupuli)
Enumerated attributes with I18n and ActiveRecord/Mongoid support
Access the most powerful time series database as a service. Ingest, store, & analyze all types of time series data in a fully-managed, purpose-built database. Keep data forever with low-cost storage and superior data compression.
ActsAsTree -- Extends ActiveRecord to add simple support for organizing items into parent–children relationships.
🔩 ActiveRecord::JSONValidator makes it easy to validate JSON attributes against a JSON schema.
ActiveRecord plugin allowing you to hide and restore records without actually deleting them.
A self-hosted digital asset manager for 3d print files
Track changes to your rails models
Static code analysis for 29 languages.. Your projects are multi-language. So is SonarQube analysis. Find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells so you can release quality code every time. Get started analyzing your projects today for free.
Define importers that load tabular data from spreadsheets or CSV files into any ActiveRecord-like ORM.
Ruby on Rails
Ruby on Rails
render_async lets you include pages asynchronously with AJAX
Power tools for Active Record relations (scopes)
Follow associations within your ActiveRecord queries
Multi-user non-linear history tracking, auditing, undo, redo for mongoid.
ActiveRecord Where Assoc reviews and mentions
EXISTS clause for active record
2 projects | reddit.com/r/rails | 29 Oct 2022
I’ve been using the activerecord_where_assoc gem for this. I think it’s API is more natural than this proposal.
My new gem lets you follow associations when doing ActiveRecord queries. Here's an intro for follow_assoc.
3 projects | reddit.com/r/rails | 29 Sep 2021
Your examples using joins would return duplicated Sections. That might force you to add a distinct. I personally find it wrong to do a distinct in a scope just to be able to make the condition I want the scope to do. It's a hidden side effect that could cause problem elsewhere and it's unexpected from the name of the scope. I made a gem to deal with that situation: where_assoc. There is definitely an overlap between both gem.
Rails 6.1 adds query method associated to check for the association presence
2 projects | reddit.com/r/rails | 15 Feb 2021
Assuming that ... was indicating some form of annoyance with that distinct, you might want to take a look at activerecord_where_assoc
Active Record: x.includes(y): y was not recognized for preload
Here are more examples.
Here is an introduction to the gem.
I highly recommend looking at my gem : activerecord_where_assoc
There are multiple ways to filter by an associatin in Rails and they all have problems.
A note from our sponsor - #<SponsorshipServiceOld:0x00007f160f5a7220>
www.saashub.com | 25 Mar 2023
MaxLap/activerecord_where_assoc is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.
- ActiveRecord Where Assoc VS Ruby JSON Schema Validator
- ActiveRecord Where Assoc VS Enumerize
- ActiveRecord Where Assoc VS ActsAsTree
- ActiveRecord Where Assoc VS activerecord_json_validator
- ActiveRecord Where Assoc VS ActsAsParanoid
- ActiveRecord Where Assoc VS van_dam
- ActiveRecord Where Assoc VS PaperTrail
- ActiveRecord Where Assoc VS ActiveImporter
- ActiveRecord Where Assoc VS render_async
- ActiveRecord Where Assoc VS mongoid-history