SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
TidyverseSkeptic Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to TidyverseSkeptic
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
Chain.jl
A Julia package for piping a value through a series of transformation expressions using a more convenient syntax than Julia's native piping functionality.
-
Dash.jl
Dash for Julia - A Julia interface to the Dash ecosystem for creating analytic web applications in Julia. No JavaScript required.
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
TidyverseSkeptic reviews and mentions
-
Why Pandas feels clunky when coming from R
I just don't get these to be honest -- besides the fact that author missed simple things like `df.groupby('var',as_index=False)`, isn't this obviously arbitrary "this is easier my way" complaints? (I did R before all the chaining stuff was popular, and I wouldn't stuff everything into a single command like that even now. It isn't like you get lazy evaluation or any special data processing magic.)
So I get people love chaining and tidyverse, good for you, I don't. But at least I can acknowledge that my way (or this way) people have different preferences and one is not intrinsically easier.
Norm Matloff has a blog where he essentially just argues the opposite of all the tidyverse stuff, https://github.com/matloff/TidyverseSkeptic, but it is the same idea in reverse to me (one is not obviously easier to learn than the other IMO).
-
Where to learn R?
On the other hand, there is also a more traditional universe outside of the of the newer tidyverse approach. See the criticism of the tidyverse ecosystem by Prof Norm Matloff (of UC Davis). He provides a freely available introductory course in base R.
-
I will take that odds
Whenever I hear tidyverse, I just feel the need to leave this: TidyverseSceptic
-
Base-R Is Alive and Well
Yeah, I had never heard of him before, but I followed the link in the article above to his GitHub page and think he made some really great points about conciseness and clarity in base R code, and, I admittedly had no idea tapply() was so useful and easy to use, because I almost never see it used in any examples online. Although I agree with others here that he's misrepresenting why package developers use base R (which is to avoid dependences in their packages, which is very important), I also find myself agreeing with him that future R programmers not being taught base R is worrisome (I'm thinking of dependencies in future package development).
-
Your thoughts on base R? I never considered it and, after reading seemingly know little about it.
I was in an R group meeting. One of the members mentioned Prof. Norm Matloff and said he has comments about tidyverse. I searched and found Matloff's explanation here. What are your thoughts on tidyverse and Matloff's comments about it? As I read it, I found myself agreeing with certain points. I do not have a computer science background; I'm someone trying to learn coding because I see uses for it in my work. I started my learning, about a year ago, with tidyverse tutorials. My patchwork jumping around, maybe in addition to some of the gaps Matloff indicates, show me that I know very little about base R.
-
In charge of making the transition from Excel to R at the office
There are good arguments against tidyverse, especially for beginners. It doesn't lead to a growth in understanding the language fundamentals and requires to learn many functions, paradigms, and syntaxes not shared by base R, which can easily be overwhelming and lead to a learn-by-heart approach more than to a learn-by-understanding. There are many good articles on the topic, such as this one or a more in-depth one, suggesting to consider tidyverse a more advanced application for specific use cases, if you like the dialect. I don't, so I might be biased.
- Teaching R in a Kinder, Gentler, More Effective Manner
- An opinionated view of the Tidyverse “dialect” of the R language
-
Thoughts on book?
I would discourage you to get into the tidyverse, at least in the first stages of your R training. It's like trying to learn english AND scottish together as a foreigner. You can read some better worded discussions here https://github.com/matloff/TidyverseSkeptic and here https://towardsdatascience.com/a-thousand-gadgets-my-thoughts-on-the-r-tidyverse-2441d8504433?gi=1b0a3648b6e6
-
Ho everyone I am R beginer. I need to to change the data type of these two columns, I tried as many ways I could find on the internet but it just won't work for me. This is really frustrating especially when you are a beginer, can you pleae provide a solution ? Thanks a lot in advance !
My opinions are largely in agreement with Norm Matloff on the subject actually.
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 25 Apr 2024
Stats
The primary programming language of TidyverseSkeptic is TeX.
Popular Comparisons
- TidyverseSkeptic VS Chain.jl
- TidyverseSkeptic VS RCall.jl
- TidyverseSkeptic VS VegaLite.jl
- TidyverseSkeptic VS PackageCompiler.jl
- TidyverseSkeptic VS Transformers.jl
- TidyverseSkeptic VS swirl
- TidyverseSkeptic VS magrittr
- TidyverseSkeptic VS Genie.jl
- TidyverseSkeptic VS org-mode
- TidyverseSkeptic VS cmssw
Sponsored