Gllvm Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to gllvm based on common topics and language

c2goasm

1 1,227 10.0 Go gllvm VS c2goasm

Discontinued C to Go Assembly
clangir

2 274 10.0 gllvm VS clangir

A new (MLIR based) high-level IR for clang.
InfluxDB

www.influxdata.com sponsored

Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
checkedc-llvm-project

1 13 6.3 gllvm VS checkedc-llvm-project

This repo contains a version of clang that is modified to support Checked C. Checked C is an extension to C that lets programmers write C code with bounds checking and improved type-safety.
go-recipes

7 3,807 8.2 Go gllvm VS go-recipes

🦩 Tools for Go projects
thompson-regex

2 7 0.0 Go gllvm VS thompson-regex

A simple regex-to-golang compiler based on Thompson's construction algorithm.
gopio

2 16 0.0 Go gllvm VS gopio

Raspberry pi GPIO controller package(CGO)
ComX

1 1 10.0 Go gllvm VS ComX

Discontinued ComX is a lightweight and user-friendly command-line interface (CLI) tool for managing C/C++ projects.
WorkOS

workos.com sponsored

The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better gllvm alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to gllvm

gllvm reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of gllvm. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-07-02.

Turns out GCC has imperative argument handling
2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 2 Jul 2022

I think this comment puts it nicely: https://github.com/SRI-CSL/gllvm/issues/48#issuecomment-8444...
But hang on, this is Linux where file extensions are basically just decoration. So if GCC now has special behaviour (and a different linker invocation) depending if the file is a source or an object file, does that mean GCC has to do content sniffing to figure out what the command is supposed to do?