RVS_UIKit_Toolbox Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to RVS_UIKit_Toolbox
-
log4shell-tools
Tool that runs a test to check whether one of your applications is affected by the recent vulnerabilities in log4j: CVE-2021-44228 and CVE-2021-45046
-
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
public-pentesting-reports
A list of public penetration test reports published by several consulting firms and academic security groups.
-
Logback
The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java.
-
keychain-swift
Helper functions for saving text in Keychain securely for iOS, OS X, tvOS and watchOS.
-
-
lunasec
LunaSec - Dependency Security Scanner that automatically notifies you about vulnerabilities like Log4Shell or node-ipc in your Pull Requests and Builds. Protect yourself in 30 seconds with the LunaTrace GitHub App: https://github.com/marketplace/lunatrace-by-lunasec/
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
RVS_UIKit_Toolbox reviews and mentions
-
Log4j: The Pain Just Keeps Going and Going
> I don't think I could in good conscience recommend your approach as a general practice.
I can live with that, but ... (There's always a "but")
I am not happy at all, with the general industry practice of writing every project to be something that can be understood by inexperienced, undisciplined coders.
Every language and programming methodology has an "advanced" type of thing, requiring people to have experience and/or book-larnin'.
I write Swift at a fairly advanced level. I am not at the level of some heavy-duty advanced Swift people, but I am pretty "idiomatic," in my approach. It is not "rewritten TypeScript," like so much code out there.
My code is very well-documented, and I hold myself to standards of Quality that most folks in the industry consider to be obsessive to the point of insanity. My testing code usually dwarfs my implementation code, and my documentation is, let's say ... complete. You can see what I mean in my latest module[0].
I won't write junk, so that someone used to junk, can comprehend it. If people aren't willing to learn enough to understand my middle-of-the-road semi-advanced Swift, then I can't help them. Swift is an awesome language. I feel that we are doing ourselves a disservice, if we do not explore it.
I write for myself. I write code and documentation that I want to use (and I use it). I really don't care, whether or not someone else "approves" of it. I am not relying on others to review, maintain, or patch my code.
When I do use other people's code, I vet it fairly carefully. Including a dependency is a really serious matter. I'm handing full control of my execution context to code that someone else wrote. I'd damn well better take that Responsibility seriously.
Stats
RiftValleySoftware/RVS_UIKit_Toolbox is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of RVS_UIKit_Toolbox is Swift.