lol

Λ ⚬ λ: Functional Lattice Cryptography (by cpeikert)

Lol Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to lol

  1. ed25519

    Minimal ed25519 Haskell package, binding to the ref10 SUPERCOP implementation.

  2. SaaSHub

    SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives

    SaaSHub logo
  3. HsOpenSSL

    0 lol VS HsOpenSSL

    OpenSSL binding for Haskell

  4. newhope

    0 lol VS newhope

    Haskell implementation of the NewHope key exchange protocol (by unprolix)

  5. qnap-decrypt

    0 lol VS qnap-decrypt

    Decrypt files encrypted by the QNAP's Hybrid Backup Sync

  6. nonce

    0 lol VS nonce

    Generate cryptographic nonces.

  7. zerobin

    0 lol VS zerobin

    Share secrets via 0bin sites running https://github.com/sametmax/0bin (by zalora)

  8. mcl

    0 lol VS mcl

    Bindings to mcl, a generic and fast pairing-based cryptography library

  9. pureMD5

    0 lol VS pureMD5

    A reasonably performing MD5 implementation in pure Haskell

  10. siphash

    0 lol VS siphash

    Discontinued siphash algorithm in haskell

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better lol alternative or higher similarity.

lol discussion

Log in or Post with

lol reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of lol. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning lol yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

Stats

Basic lol repo stats
0
233
0.0
about 5 years ago

cpeikert/Lol is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 only which is an OSI approved license.

The primary programming language of lol is Haskell.


Sponsored
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com

Did you know that Haskell is
the 30th most popular programming language
based on number of references?