Strong named assemblies — To sign or not to sign?

This page summarizes the projects mentioned and recommended in the original post on dev.to
.NET C# dotnet-core Application Frameworks Strong Naming

InfluxDB
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Our great sponsors

  • CoreFX

    Discontinued This repo is used for servicing PR's for .NET Core 2.1 and 3.1. Please visit us at https://github.com/dotnet/runtime

    • This git diff https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/pull/33784/files#

  • docs

    This repository contains .NET Documentation. (by dotnet)

    • According to Microsoft, you should strong sign your dlls [link]

  • InfluxDB

    Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.

    InfluxDB logo

  • Strong Namer

    • This thing exists: strong namer – sign dlls which are not signed [link]

  • CSharpFunctionalExtensions

    Functional extensions for C#

    • Vladimir Khorikov doesn't sign his libs, since no one is doing it anymore [link]

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a more popular project.

Suggest a related project

Related posts