Is there a convention for "private" struct members?

This page summarizes the projects mentioned and recommended in the original post on /r/C_Programming

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
  • generate-opaque-structs

    Example to show how to generate opaque structs with proper size and alignment

  • Opaque structs and memory allocation are orthogonal. You can just take the size and alignment of the struct and create a new one with a byte buffer: https://github.com/friendlyanon/generate-opaque-structs

  • SDS

    Simple Dynamic Strings library for C

  • The approach you suggest works in some cases, but I don't think the one you suggest is very good. I think a good example of such use, is sds string. He uses a hidden prefix, instead of suffix, but that is just an implementation detail. It works because he is returning a pointer to the user data. However, sds string should only be manipulated via functions, while user data can be manipulated like C strings. There is only one public header, but what user is concern with, is just the opaque pointer 'sds', which is manipulated by functions, so those structs that sds string are could as well be in a private header.

  • InfluxDB

    Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.

    InfluxDB logo
NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a more popular project.

Suggest a related project

Related posts