How much overhead does nodejs graphql have?...

• async-graphql

  19 3,387 9.0 Rust

  A GraphQL server library implemented in Rust

  

  If you need more performance, don't use Node.js. async-graphql (Rust) or graphql-crystal (Crystal) will run circles around any Node.js server.

• SaaSHub

  www.saashub.com featured

  SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives

  

• crystal

  244 19,503 9.8 Crystal

  The Crystal Programming Language

  

  If you need more performance, don't use Node.js. async-graphql (Rust) or graphql-crystal (Crystal) will run circles around any Node.js server.

• graphql

  7 134 5.3 Crystal

  GraphQL server library for Crystal (by graphql-crystal)

  

  If you need more performance, don't use Node.js. async-graphql (Rust) or graphql-crystal (Crystal) will run circles around any Node.js server.

• graphql-jit

  10 1,049 7.0 TypeScript

  GraphQL execution using a JIT compiler

  

  In the end like all performance questions you'll have to measure it. Persisted queries, and even more extreme approaches, like a GraphQL JIT (https://github.com/zalando-incubator/graphql-jit) can remove a lot of the overhead.

Suggest a related project