-
Yes, it gives you low-level control over memory, but it's also got high-level constructs like iterators and I'd choose Cargo, Clap, Serde, Rayon, etc. over their Python counterparts any day.
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
I didn’t know that about Qt. Interesting! Have you looked at ICED, by chance? Assuming it was more mature, do you think that’s abstracted high enough to replace Python on the GUI side of things?
-
When the ecosystem has had time to make equivalent packages, Rust's packages are more convenient, if for no other reason than Cargo is more convenient than Python's closest runner-up, Poetry.
-
I use crates like actix-web and Maud for smaller projects and they work beautifully... but it takes time for a language to grow a Django a Rails and an ecosystem of apps that can add new tables and migrations into the ORM later, add new pages to the auto-generated admin UI, expose new template tags, etc. all with one line in the project config.
-
I use crates like actix-web and Maud for smaller projects and they work beautifully... but it takes time for a language to grow a Django a Rails and an ecosystem of apps that can add new tables and migrations into the ORM later, add new pages to the auto-generated admin UI, expose new template tags, etc. all with one line in the project config.
-
Not the person you asked, but I’ve seen people use https://github.com/Aleph-Alpha/ts-rs to generate TS interfaces at compile time for use on the frontend. Saves a bunch of time when scaffolding up a new data model without having to use a custom gRPC plugin or something wonky like that. That makes Rust and TS a pretty powerful pairing IMO.
-
I would like to add my opposite opinion about Qt Quick. I think it's a great UI framework for both desktop and mobile, and you can go pretty far with it and qmetabject-rs crate, check out Gyroflow https://github.com/gyroflow/gyroflow