Our great sponsors
-
-
The images I've set up for web use are not very large. I don't have a RAW workflow.
So maybe I'm missing something.
I've found it very challenging to get better compression than optimized JPEG via Squoosh.
Of course, JPEG XL has alpha channels, and I'm comparing a new format against a standard that's had 20 years of refinement in implementation.
Are we cutting ourselves off from a similar future with JPEG XL?
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
> Once I hit the limit with jpg I switched to png
Since that it seems that you're okay with lossy images, have you've tried RDOPNG (https://github.com/richgel999/rdopng)? It won't be as great as JPEG or JXL but it should eke out better-compressed images.
-
here is FUIF (one of JXL parents) author writing about benefits of progressive: https://github.com/cloudinary/fuif
-
You do know that Google was one of the main contributors to JPEG XL (see https://github.com/google/pik )
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.