Yet another command line argument parser: bpaf 0.5.5

This page summarizes the projects mentioned and recommended in the original post on /r/rust

CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers
Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
coderabbit.ai
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
  1. argparse-rosetta-rs

    Comparing argparse APIs

    Very nice to see non-utf8 supported here. This is now looking like a very good niche in the tradeoffs among argument parsers (see: https://github.com/rosetta-rs/argparse-rosetta-rs). I guess I should try it first, but this is looking like an obvious recommendation as the "default choice" of argument parser to me.

  2. CodeRabbit

    CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.

    CodeRabbit logo
  3. bpaf

    Command line parser with applicative interface

    https://github.com/pacak/bpaf/blob/master/examples/rectangle.rs#L32 (with a small cosmetic issue - https://github.com/pacak/bpaf/issues/47) - thank you for your crazy idea <3 :)

  4. venial

    "A very small syn"

    venial is supposed to be a lighter weight alternative to syn that might work. Besides level of maturity, the biggest risk is slowing things down for people already using syn but I think there was a claim that it wasn't noticeable.

  5. rustc-dev-guide

    A guide to how rustc works and how to contribute to it.

    Do you have links to any good info about how much rustc reuses from previous runs? This is the first time i hear about reuse at the function level. I guess the rustc-dev-guide would be a good place for me to start?

  6. Cargo

    The Rust package manager

    Other than having to define a group? I think it's only logical if you want your users to see something as a logical group - to have it as a group inside the code as well. Like cargo defines all those logical groups for features, timings, etc: https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/blob/master/src/bin/cargo/commands/build.rs

  7. SaaSHub

    SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives

    SaaSHub logo
NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a more popular project.

Suggest a related project

Related posts

  • Cargo has never frustrated me like npm or pip has. Does Cargo ever get frustrating? Does anyone ever find themselves in dependency hell?

    13 projects | /r/rust | 6 Dec 2023
  • Learning Rust by Building a CLI App

    3 projects | dev.to | 25 Aug 2023
  • Is Rust's cargo-edit crate still relevant?

    2 projects | /r/rust | 12 May 2023
  • TIL about cargo add

    2 projects | /r/rust | 15 Dec 2022
  • Cargo: Namespaced and weak dependency features have been stabilized

    4 projects | /r/rust | 2 Feb 2022