Our great sponsors
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
Here is a link to the Solid [1] DID method: https://solid.github.io/did-method-solid/
[1] https://solidproject.org/
Look into sidetree protocol, I've seen a lot of people building on top of it.
Link: https://identity.foundation/sidetree/spec/
So I've just scanned over this stuff, maybe someone can fill in some gaps for me.
There's a list of DID methods "in development" [1]. Is this the list of methods, or is there a centralized registry?
If there's a centralized registry -- then this isn't really "decentralized" is it? On top of that there's a land-grab that's already begun for the method names, and isn't that going to kill the spec? com, nft, object, web, are already registered by private orgs.
But if it's not centralized, then it's not unique. What stops me from making my own "verifiable registry" [2] for eg `did:nft:internet` which cryptographically proves I own the internet? "Ceramic Network" (the owner of "nft" on the w3c site) says they own it in their registry .. but who's correct?
[1] https://w3c.github.io/did-spec-registries/#did-methods
[2] https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/#dfn-verifiable-data-registry
We're already in use of dIDs on the chia blockchain, and it can be used to verify who issued an NFT to prevent fraud. People have already built games on this and used it to save character profiles (dIDs). Custody solutions are what save you, you can see Bram Cohen talk about it here https://odysee.com/@Chia:d/off-the-chain-Bram-Cohen-2022:5
Related posts
- Gitlab confirms it's removed Suyu, a fork of Nintendo Switch emulator Yuzu
- Top YouTube Alternatives to Watch in 2024 📹
- Images altered to trick machine vision can influence humans too
- Today I'm launching Flare, a video sharing site built on Nostr Like YouTube
- At this point we should all be considering a boycott.