Honest question: why is Haskell not a lisp / built on s-expressions?

• hackett

  15 1,140 0.0 Racket

  WIP implementation of a Haskell-like Lisp in Racket

This doesn't really answer your question but you may be interested in checking out https://lexi-lambda.github.io/hackett/ by u/lexilambda.

• coalton

  84 990 8.4 Common Lisp

  Coalton is an efficient, statically typed functional programming language that supercharges Common Lisp.

  

There’s Coalton: https://github.com/coalton-lang/coalton which is more of a DSL in Common Lisp, impressive though, nonetheless.

• InfluxDB

  www.influxdata.com sponsored

  Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.

  

• Carp

  84 5,393 0.7 Haskell

  A statically typed lisp, without a GC, for real-time applications.

  

And my personal favorite: https://github.com/carp-lang/Carp

• pie

  10 671 10.0 Racket

  The Pie language, which accompanies The Little Typer by Friedman and Christiansen (by the-little-typer)

  

Yep, this is one possibility - an example is the language pie from the book The Little Typer. But my claim was not that there are no expressions for types, just that declarations aren't expressions.

• structured-haskell-mode

  3 536 0.0 Emacs Lisp

  Structured editing minor mode for Haskell in Emacs

  

• WorkOS

  workos.com sponsored

  The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.

  

Suggest a related project