IDE-style autocomplete for your terminal

This page summarizes the projects mentioned and recommended in the original post on /r/emacs

CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers
Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
coderabbit.ai
featured
Nutrient - The #1 PDF SDK Library
Bad PDFs = bad UX. Slow load times, broken annotations, clunky UX frustrates users. Nutrient’s PDF SDKs gives seamless document experiences, fast rendering, annotations, real-time collaboration, 100+ features. Used by 10K+ devs, serving ~half a billion users worldwide. Explore the SDK for free.
nutrient.io
featured
  1. plugins

    Discontinued Plugin store for zsh, bash & fish. (by withfig)

    Yep, Fig is not fully open source nor we claim to be. However, Fig’s autocomplete specs are open source (github.com/withfig/autocomplete), and we're planning to open up our codebase more in the future. For example, the plugins we are launching soon will be OSS.

  2. CodeRabbit

    CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.

    CodeRabbit logo
  3. autocomplete

    IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal & shell

    Yep, Fig is not fully open source nor we claim to be. However, Fig’s autocomplete specs are open source (github.com/withfig/autocomplete), and we're planning to open up our codebase more in the future. For example, the plugins we are launching soon will be OSS.

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a more popular project.

Suggest a related project

Related posts

Did you know that TypeScript is
the 1st most popular programming language
based on number of references?