Why doesn't anyone create a search engine comparable to 2005-Google?

This page summarizes the projects mentioned and recommended in the original post on news.ycombinator.com

Our great sponsors
  • OPS - Build and Run Open Source Unikernels
  • Scout APM - Less time debugging, more time building
  • SonarLint - Deliver Cleaner and Safer Code - Right in Your IDE of Choice!
  • GitHub repo Yacy

    Distributed Peer-to-Peer Web Search Engine and Intranet Search Appliance

    > 2) Hardware costs are too high.

    Which is why the next big search engine should be distributed: https://yacy.net.

  • GitHub repo duckduckgo-locales

    Translation files for duckduckgo.com

    I think DuckDuckGo is closer to what you want. Same results for everyone, better privacy, and they're proactive about improving their results.

    https://duckduckgo.com/

    Part of the problem is that there's a lot more low-quality content to wade through now than there was in 2005. I think the Google of 2005 would have trouble delivering quality results today also.

  • OPS

    OPS - Build and Run Open Source Unikernels. Quickly and easily build and deploy open source unikernels in tens of seconds. Deploy in any language to any cloud.

  • GitHub repo awesome

    😎 Awesome lists about all kinds of interesting topics

  • GitHub repo Lobsters

    Computing-focused community centered around link aggregation and discussion

    How about just a meritocratic rating? Even here on HN I would appreciate some sort of weight on expert/experienced opinion. Although in theory I like the idea that every thought is judged on its own, the context of the author is more relevant the deeper the subject. That's one of the reasons I still read https://lobste.rs. It has a niche audience with industry experience.

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a more popular project.

Suggest a related project

Related posts