-
I just released version 0.9 of fuzzcheck. I also released a guide for it, located at https://fuzzcheck.neocities.org.
-
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
-
This Github comment shows what the code coverage viewer, named fuzzcheck-viewer, looks like. Notice that when the mouse hovers a region of code, the simplest test case to hit that region is displayed on the right. This may be useful to understand a new codebase or to refine one's assumption about the code. Also note the ⦿ sign, which indicates an unwritten “else” branch.
-
Minor typo in the above post to note - the link to fuzzcheck-view appears to accidentally have an extra er at the end, and thus is broken.
-
Hi, fuzzcheck-view looks very interesting. I've been using fuzz-rustc lately, which is a tool to find ICEs in the rust compiler, and while the results have been pretty good, I'm missing some way to organize the artifacts generated by the fuzzer: discard duplicates, categorize by panic location, detect which panics have already been fixed in the latest nightly, etc.