-
still works. In my experience so far, you only need to worry if you define your own combinators, e.g. like in https://github.com/phadej/github/commit/dd3dfbccaf4de4c3095b52fefb52c6b3c961a8f8
-
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
-
Ah, I see you are working on this already, thank you: https://github.com/haskell/aeson/pull/883
-
I benchmarked my jose library (using the benchmark suite from https://github.com/marcin-rzeznicki/libjwt-typed, which uses criterion); the JSON objects involved are small (< 8 members) and the performance difference is negligible - perhaps slightly faster (don't have to allocate a vector of hash buckets, most of which are unused). I haven't benchmarked performance with huge numbers of members but it's O(1) [amortised, degrading to O(n) for pathological inputs] -> O(log n), so I would expect a small performance decrease for objects with >> 8 members.
Related posts
-
Rate limiting vs. throttling and other API traffic management
-
Supabase RLS Alternative
-
Building a subscription tracker Desktop and iOS app with compose multiplatform - Configuring Notion
-
How to Implement Rate Limiting in Express for Node.js
-
Enable a link to a block in a note using Obsidian GitHub Publisher