-
JSX can become valid, standardized ECMAScript syntax.
But first we need a valid syntactic sugar transformation, which I propose here.
Then we need to implement it in things like babel[0] bun[1] and deno[2].
Then, frameworks would adopt it as an optional alternative implementation.
Eventually, it could gain widespread support and become standardized.
[0] https://github.com/sdegutis/vanillajsx.com/blob/main/site/un...
[1] https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/13630
[2] https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/25312
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
JSX can become valid, standardized ECMAScript syntax.
But first we need a valid syntactic sugar transformation, which I propose here.
Then we need to implement it in things like babel[0] bun[1] and deno[2].
Then, frameworks would adopt it as an optional alternative implementation.
Eventually, it could gain widespread support and become standardized.
[0] https://github.com/sdegutis/vanillajsx.com/blob/main/site/un...
[1] https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/13630
[2] https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/25312
-
JSX can become valid, standardized ECMAScript syntax.
But first we need a valid syntactic sugar transformation, which I propose here.
Then we need to implement it in things like babel[0] bun[1] and deno[2].
Then, frameworks would adopt it as an optional alternative implementation.
Eventually, it could gain widespread support and become standardized.
[0] https://github.com/sdegutis/vanillajsx.com/blob/main/site/un...
[1] https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/13630
[2] https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/25312