Never Update Anything

• OpenID

  14 970 9.1 C

  OpenID Certified™ OpenID Connect Relying Party implementation for Apache HTTP Server 2.x

  

  That's fair! Honestly, it's kind of cool to see how many different kinds of packages are available for Apache.

  A bit off topic, but I rather enjoyed the idea behind mod_auth_openidc, which ships an OpenID Connect Relying Party implementation, so some of the auth can be offloaded to Apache in combination with something like Keycloak and things in the protected services can be kept a bit simpler (e.g. just reading the headers provided by the module): https://github.com/OpenIDC/mod_auth_openidc

  Now, whether that's a good idea, that's debatable, but there are also plenty of other implementations of Relying Party out there as well: https://openid.net/developers/certified-openid-connect-imple...

  I am also on the fence about using mod_security with Apache, because I know for a fact that Cloudflare would be a better option for that, but at the same time self-hosting is nice and I don't have anything too precious on those servers that a sub-optimal WAF would cause me that many headaches. I guess it's cool that I can, even down to decent rulesets: https://owasp.org/www-project-modsecurity-core-rule-set/ though the OWASP Coraza project also seems nice: https://coraza.io/

• InfluxDB

  www.influxdata.com featured

  Purpose built for real-time analytics at any scale. InfluxDB Platform is powered by columnar analytics, optimized for cost-efficient storage, and built with open data standards.

  

• placeholder

  10 669 3.5 Python

  Fork of Python 2.7 with new syntax, builtins, and libraries backported from Python 3.

• cli

  45 4,826 9.9 Go

  The Docker CLI (by docker)

  

  - Due to some reason I still wasn't able to figure out, the cluster will sometimes just break. The leader loses its connection to the other manager nodes, which in turn do NOT elect a new leader. The only solution is to force-recreate the whole cluster and then redeploy all workloads (see [4]).

  Sure, our use case is somewhat special (running a cluster used by a lot of tenants), and we were able to find workarounds (some more dirty than others) to most of our issues with Docker Swarm. But what annoys me is that for almost all of the issues we had, there was a GitHub ticket that didn't get any official response for years. And in many cases, the reporters just give up waiting and migrate to K8s out of despair or frustration. Just a few quotes from the linked issues:

  > We, too, started out with Docker Swarm and quickly saw all our production clusters crashing every few days because of this bug. […] This was well over two years (!) ago. This was when I made the hard decision to migrate to K3s. We never looked back.

  > We recently entirely gave up on Docker Swarm. Our new cluster runs on Kubernetes, and we've written scripts and templates for ourselves to reduce the network-stack management complexities to a manageable level for us. […] In our opinion, Docker Swarm is not a production-ready containerization environment and never will be. […] Years of waiting and hoping have proved fruitless, and we finally had to go to something reliable (albeit harder to deal with).

  > IMO, Docker Swarm is just not ready for prime-time as an enterprise-grade cluster/container approach. The fact that it is possible to trivially (through no apparent fault of your own) have your management cluster suddenly go brainless is an outrage. And "fixing" the problem by recreating your management cluster is NOT a FIX! It's a forced recreation of your entire enterprise almost from scratch. This should never need to happen. But if you run Docker Swarm long enough, it WILL happen to you. And you WILL plunge into a Hell the scope of which is precisely defined by the size and scope of your containerization empire. In our case, this was half a night in Hell. […] This event was the last straw for us. Moving to Kubernetes. Good luck to you hardy souls staying on Docker Swarm!

  Sorry, if this seems like like Docker Swarm bashing. K8s has it's own issues, for sure! But at least there is a big community to turn to for help, if things to sideways.

  [1]: https://github.com/docker/cli/issues/2527

• Moby

  223 68,436 9.9 Go

  The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems

  

• Docker Compose

  408 33,509 9.5 Go

  Define and run multi-container applications with Docker

  

  [3]: https://github.com/docker/compose/issues/8561#issuecomment-1...

• SaaSHub

  www.saashub.com featured

  SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives

  

Suggest a related project