Our great sponsors
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
That's the kind of feedback I was looking for, thanks. I usually go by eye, but at 14:1, I was expecting a blurry artefact-ridden mess, and it just didn't look all that bad at first blush.... I'll definitely check out ssimulacra2, thanks for the suggestion. I also need to sit down and do some proper pixel-peeping on a better screen... I think my monitor falls into the 'HD-aren't' class of HDR displays, so I'm likely missing detail somewhere. My purpose is archival, I want to preserve quality but not needlessly waste drive space on less efficient codecs. I'm not concerned by the resultant bit rate, so long as it has improved compression efficiency over the original.
If you need to compare images easily, consider slow.pics. Or ICAT, or Video Comparison Tool. And actually, even x264 and x265 don't have perfect CRF scales as well, they are offset by a constant iirc.
You can try VMAF as well (which ffmpeg supports). It's normally recommended to make a lossless copy first as a baseline too
Related posts
- Why is my video so pixelated after putting through handbrake? I thought my settings were fine.
- GitHub - pixop/video-compare: Split screen video comparison tool using FFmpeg and SDL2
- Compare different models
- How do you guys visually compare clips?
- Is FFmpeg able to convert DVD iso to a set of mp4/mkv?