zfs
zrepl
Our great sponsors
zfs | zrepl | |
---|---|---|
719 | 22 | |
10,114 | 895 | |
1.2% | 1.2% | |
9.6 | 6.8 | |
7 days ago | about 1 month ago | |
C | Go | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
zfs
-
Radxa's SATA HAT makes compact Pi 5 NAS
> The only non-junk PCIe3 option that's even advertised here recently is the overpriced WD Red SN700.
Those WD drives seem to have some real issues, at least with ZFS and btrfs. :(
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/discussions/14793
- OpenZFS: Fix corruption caused by MMAP flushing problems
- ZFS: Some copied files are still corrupted (chunks replaced by zeros)
-
DiskClick: Ever wanted to hear Old Hard drive sounds
IMO the "next fs" is just zfs. They somewhat recently merged RAIDZ expansion feature https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/12225 and make regular improvements. If no file system has what you need today, zfs will probably be the first one to have it "tomorrow," imo.
- OpenZFS bug reports for native encryption
-
A data corruption bug in OpenZFS?
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/15526#issuecomment-181...
> zpool get all tank | grep bclone
> kc3000 bcloneused 442M
> kc3000 bclonesaved 1.42G
> kc3000 bcloneratio 4.30x
> My understanding is this: If the result is 0 for both bcloneused and bclonesaved then it's safe to say that you don't have silent corruption.
-
Ask HN: What's your "it's not stupid if it works" story?
A couple years ago, I had an idea for convincing a filesystem to go faster using 2 compression steps instead of one. I couldn't see why it wouldn't work, and I also couldn't convince myself it should.
It seems to have worked out. [1]
[1] - https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/commit/f375b23c026aec00cc9527...
-
ZFS Profiling on Arch Linux
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/7631
This is a long-standing issue with zvols which affects overall system stability, and has no real solution as of yet.
-
Using ZFS on single disks, combining them with mergerfs, and paritizing them with Snapraid
TIL. Thank you! https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15022
-
Why does primarycache=metadata reduce my un-cached read speeds?
Difference may be significant, yes https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/14243
zrepl
- Zrepl – ZFS replication
- zrepl: A one-stop, integrated solution for ZFS replication
- PVE Host disk upgrade
-
Void Linux and root-on-ZFS question
Lastly there is zrepl. This is an automatic snapshot creation, pruning and replication daemon. It lets you automate the creation of ZFS snapshots at specific intervals, apply a retention policy to them, and replicate them out to a remote system with ZFS, like a NAS with TrueNAS on it.
- Container Updating Strategies
-
How do you all prepare for a disaster recovery of your nextcloud instance?
I run it in a FreeBSD jail and take frequent ZFS snapshots using zrepl. I’ve had to restore after failed updates and it worked flawlessly.
-
Recommend ZFS automation scripts for off-server backups?
As others have noted, I use syncoid but zrepl is an alternative that could be considered.
-
Imagine You're a Goofball: Dynamic Preventative ZFS Snapshots
I’m going to throw out Zrepl again because it’s amazing: https://zrepl.github.io/
- Using ZFS backup drive for rsync manually
-
Question about best way to do zfs replication to a friends server
Current idea: We offer some form of container each other, where we have that zvol mounted somewhere for the replication use. This would mean that I could create an "inside zfs" where I create a filebased zpool. How is performance on a filebased zpool? (Although it is technically not so important that it performs critically, just trying to find the - or one of - "best" ways). Then we would offer each an ssh endpoint into that container (It doesn't have to be ssh, but it is so far convenient to setup and resilient to be open to the public). And my current plan is to use zrepl (https://zrepl.github.io/) to organise replication from my home server to this "inside" zpool.
What are some alternatives?
zstd - Zstandard - Fast real-time compression algorithm
sanoid - These are policy-driven snapshot management and replication tools which use OpenZFS for underlying next-gen storage. (Btrfs support plans are shelved unless and until btrfs becomes reliable.)
7-Zip-zstd - 7-Zip with support for Brotli, Fast-LZMA2, Lizard, LZ4, LZ5 and Zstandard
zfs_autobackup - ZFS autobackup is used to periodicly backup ZFS filesystems to other locations. Easy to use and very reliable.
lxd-snapper - LXD snapshots, automated
RocksDB - A library that provides an embeddable, persistent key-value store for fast storage.
zfswatcher - ZFS pool monitoring and notification daemon
snapper - Manage filesystem snapshots and allow undo of system modifications
zfsbackup-go - Backup ZFS snapshots to cloud storage such as Google, Amazon, Azure, etc. Built with the enterprise in mind.
zfsbootmenu - ZFS Bootloader for root-on-ZFS systems with support for snapshots and native full disk encryption
yunohost - YunoHost is an operating system aiming to simplify as much as possible the administration of a server. This repository corresponds to the core code, written mostly in Python and Bash.