flume VS pest

The repository seems abandoned; or maybe complete?

At work we use flume, which is another capable multi-producer, multi-consumer async-capable channel [1]. It's great for shuffling data between threads, as well as between async tasks, and between threads and async tasks. Basically any time you want to pieces of code to exchange data or signals without pesky shared state.

1: https://github.com/zesterer/flume

I also like flume, it has impressive performance (although not the best). More importantly, it's written only with safe rust. https://github.com/zesterer/flume

The most commonly suggested replacement for mspc is crossbeam-channel; flume is also relatively popular.

It's not officially deprecated, but the alternatives on crates.io are considered better. flume and crossbeam-channel feature less unsafe code and offer better performance. Benchmarks.

it's slow (checkout flume's benchmarks for example)

I would have done the same. I think, and I might be wrong, but the only other alternative, besides anything unsafe, would be to pass mutex back, but I am not sure this would be faster. Btw, I have not done testing, but you might want to look at Flume for your mpsc channels: https://github.com/zesterer/flume Flume, seems to be very fast mpsc implementation. I am planning to evaluate it for logging system.

For concurrency/parallelism, you launch at most 2 * CPU Cores, PIN them and use a fast broker to spread the task (like a ring buffer or an MPSC). But you keep linear scan, tight loops, SIMD friendly data, on each. You are not switching context that much, and instead, bet you will process the batch fast. (CPUs are fast today!)

https://crates.io/crates/flume and https://crates.io/crates/crossbeam-channel provide MPMC channels.

And some related parser tools: - https://github.com/kevinmehall/rust-peg - https://github.com/pest-parser/pest - https://github.com/lalrpop/lalrpop

I had recently completed the first year of my Computer Science class at school and will begin my second year soon. My schools' class forces the use of Java programming language, and I absolutely hated it. So, over the course of a little less than a month, I wrote my own programming language, in Rust (objectively best programming language), using pest, to be as similar to Rust as possible, but compiling to Java.

I second pest.rs. Using it is fairly intuitive and there's also a live playground on their website which is great for quickly developing and testing your AST (abstract syntax tree) parser for whatever language you're implementing.

This is where you'll run into trouble. People who write parsing-related Rust crates generally write things like pest that expect their syntax to be defined completely at compile time so the parser can be run through the compiler's optimizers for best performance.

Give https://pest.rs a try.

For now I have used pest to generate an AST that borrows from the given input. But if I can manage to make the parser generic over the return type it may be worth a refactoring.