youki VS krustlet

There are ton of optimizations that could be applied to kubernetes itself, including some custom CRI's (youki cri etc), read-only fs handling (erofs etc), and stacked CNI's on top of SR-IOV and Multus. Gluing it all together can be a real pain.

Looks like there is youki [1] for that.

[1] https://github.com/containers/youki

Somebody at Oracle was at one point writing an implementation of the oci-runtime in rust https://github.com/oracle/railcar/, an active successor of that project appears to be https://github.com/containers/youki

The Full changelog + release notes can be seen here : https://github.com/containers/youki/releases/tag/v0.0.4

Oh it’s certainly looking like that IMO.

You can run wasm in k8s: https://krustlet.dev/

Docker itself can run wasm: https://wasmlabs.dev/articles/docker-without-containers/

There are a few serverless runtimes based on wasm: https://wasmcloud.com/

A lot of those are powered by wasmtime or WasmEdge.

If you’re wanting to be able to just pull down a random app and run it as wasm, that’s inherently harder with wasm, because you have to recompile, and amazing compiling stuff is always harder than it should be. For example I compiled jq to wasm to other day, so you dont have to worry (as much) about the CVEs that was issued recently. https://github.com/rockwotj/jq-wasi

It can, kubevirt is a project for running VMs https://kubevirt.io/ and there have been more esoteric things like WASM (https://github.com/krustlet/krustlet).

Or you can run Krustlet instead of Kubelet. That makes it so you can only run WebAssembly on the cluster - so no Go, no Python, only Rust!

But the project seems to have died: https://github.com/krustlet/krustlet/graphs/contributors

There are some cloud providers that are starting to offer wasm support. Docker is currently working on wasm https://docs.docker.com/desktop/wasm/ There is also krustlet https://krustlet.dev/ which lets you run wasm in kubernetes

> If one writes Go or Rust, there are much better ways to run them than targeting WASM

wasm has its place, especially for contained workloads that can be wrapped in its strict capability boundaries (think, file-encoding jobs that shouldn't access anything else but said files: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29112713).

> Containers are still the defacto standard.

wasmedge [0], atmo [1], krustlet [2], blueboat [3] and numerous other projects are turning up the heat [4]!

[0] https://github.com/WasmEdge/WasmEdge

[1] https://github.com/suborbital/atmo

[2] https://github.com/krustlet/krustlet

[3] https://github.com/losfair/blueboat

[4] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30155295