yoha VS just

GitHub - handtracking-io/yoha: A practical hand tracking engine.

Demo (Code)

GitHub

Hey, thank you for this question. You basically want to be able to use hand tracking like a computer mouse (please correct me if I'm wrong). My gut feel is that this would not be too hard to do. If the major operating systems offer the respective APIs to do so (which I would assume they do) then it should be mainly a matter of putting in the work to implement it. If you want to, feel free to open an issue on GitHub to document this feature request.

One can build this pretty easily for a website that you are hosting with the existing API (https://github.com/handtracking-io/yoha/tree/master/docs).

However, you likely want this functionality on any website that you are visiting for which you probably need to build a browser extension. I haven't tried incorporating YoHa into a browser extension but if somebody were to try I'd be happy to help.

Thank you for the feedback. I can confirm there seems to be an issue with iOS/Chrome and created a GitHub issue for it (https://github.com/handtracking-io/yoha/issues/5).

Note that if you were trying iOS/Safari and not iOS/Chrome there is nothing that can be done due to a limitation that is documented in the section "Discussion" here: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/webkitjs/canvasren... Will document this.

Thank you for the feedback. I would like to fix this but I neither own a Chromebook nor does it seem like I can use a platform like browserstack to reproduce the issue (didn't find Chromebook as available device there). If you would like to help debugging the issue you can open a GitHub issue here: https://github.com/handtracking-io/yoha/issues

You can roll your own or use a utility library. A simple zero-dependency library would be something like just-group-by [1]. Although I now prefer remeda [2] as it seems to have the best typescript support, especially the strict variants such as `grouBy.strict`.

[1] https://github.com/angus-c/just#just-group-by

Tree-shaking doesn't help much when the tree-shaken implementation is so bloated.

Here's the one you referenced, lodash.chunk: https://unpkg.com/lodash.chunk – 140 lines after removing comments and whitespace.

That's pretty small compared to a lot of the lodash utilities. Try spot-checking a few on unpkg.

I prefer angus's `just` utilities: https://github.com/angus-c/just

I absolutely love this. When I need some Lodash alternative I'll usually reference angus-c/just but I am definitely bookmarking this for next time.

The just set of utility functions are really nice to use. https://github.com/angus-c/just

Just doesn't have everything but it's pretty good

One of my favourite "libraries" are the "just" packages, where each part of the library is it's own simple package with zero dependencies (https://github.com/angus-c/just) so you essentially just npm install the specific thing you want - which is generally a single function.

If the code should, as you say, be 5 lines, why take on a dependency at all? By doing so, you end up with a catch-all solution that does almost nothing other than JSON.stringify your args, which is extremely poorly optimized to handle many situations, e.g. one of your args is a primitive and the other is a large config object.