xonsh
ShellCheck
Our great sponsors
xonsh | ShellCheck | |
---|---|---|
112 | 487 | |
7,899 | 34,757 | |
4.8% | - | |
8.7 | 8.6 | |
9 days ago | 16 days ago | |
Python | Haskell | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
xonsh
-
This Week In Python
xonsh – Python-powered, cross-platform, Unix-gazing shell
- FLaNK Stack Weekly 19 Feb 2024
-
Xonsh: Python-powered, cross-platform, Unix-gazing shell
Take a look at https://github.com/xonsh/xonsh/issues before deciding to abandon the devil you know.
I prefer sticking with bash where necessary (where a script is the only thing that will reasonably work), and elsewhere using a programming language with testing, type checking, modularity, and compilation into something with zero or minimal runtime dependencies.
You need to downgrade ptk version. Look here - https://github.com/xonsh/xonsh/issues/5241#issuecomment-1961...
-
Google ZX – A tool for writing better scripts
Friends, I'm not saying that tools like zx are not good. I do like to write some scripts using js/ts. I believe pythoners prefer https://xon.sh/ . Perl is also attractive and interesting. Fish is friendly.
However, I still believe that posix-shell has its own advantages. The balance among size, code length, and expressiveness. I think the only possible competitors are tcl and perl, maybe lua.
-
Shh: Simple Shell Scripting from Haskell
Those of you who use (or used) this as your shell: care to share your experience?
It seems a lot less full-featured than https://xon.sh/, but maybe you don't need a lot of bells and whistles for regular usage. I mostly run build, execute, and install commands.
I'm somewhat enticed at the possibility of being able to wrap common executables into forms that are typed (like nushell or elvish) and manipulate them in a way that leverages the type checker.
-
Marcel the Shell
In that case, is it even more similar to xonsh?
> Marcel pipes python values in streams
That's indeed much better, all those untyped strings in shells in a bad old design
Though hopefully xonsh will implement this as well https://github.com/xonsh/xonsh/issues/3967
- Shshsh is a bridge connects Python and shell
ShellCheck
-
DevSecOps with AWS- IaC at scale - Building your own platform - Part 1
... #************************** Terraform ************************************* ARG TERRAFORM_VERSION=1.7.3 RUN set -ex \ && curl -O https://releases.hashicorp.com/terraform/${TERRAFORM_VERSION}/terraform_${TERRAFORM_VERSION}_linux_amd64.zip && unzip terraform_${TERRAFORM_VERSION}_linux_amd64.zip -d /usr/local/bin/ RUN set -ex \ && mkdir -p $HOME/.terraform.d/plugin-cache && echo 'plugin_cache_dir = "$HOME/.terraform.d/plugin-cache"' > ~/.terraformrc #************************* Terragrunt ************************************* ARG TERRAGRUNT_VERSION=0.55.1 RUN set -ex \ && wget https://github.com/gruntwork-io/terragrunt/releases/download/v${TERRAGRUNT_VERSION}/terragrunt_linux_amd64 -q \ && mv terragrunt_linux_amd64 /usr/local/bin/terragrunt \ && chmod +x /usr/local/bin/terragrunt #*********************** Terramate **************************************** ARG TERRAMATE_VERSION=0.4.5 RUN set -ex \ && wget https://github.com/mineiros-io/terramate/releases/download/v${TERRAMATE_VERSION}/terramate_${TERRAMATE_VERSION}_linux_x86_64.tar.gz \ && tar -xzf terramate_${TERRAMATE_VERSION}_linux_x86_64.tar.gz \ && mv terramate /usr/local/bin/terramate \ && chmod +x /usr/local/bin/terramate #*********************** tfsec ******************************************** ARG TFSEC_VERSION=1.28.5 RUN set -ex \ && wget https://github.com/aquasecurity/tfsec/releases/download/v${TFSEC_VERSION}/tfsec-linux-amd64 \ && mv tfsec-linux-amd64 /usr/local/bin/tfsec \ && chmod +x /usr/local/bin/tfsec \ && terragrunt --version #**********************Terraform docs ************************************ ARG TERRRAFORM_DOCS_VERSION=0.17.0 RUN set -ex \ && curl -sSLo ./terraform-docs.tar.gz https://terraform-docs.io/dl/v${TERRRAFORM_DOCS_VERSION}/terraform-docs-v${TERRRAFORM_DOCS_VERSION}-$(uname)-amd64.tar.gz \ && tar -xzf terraform-docs.tar.gz \ && chmod +x terraform-docs \ && mv terraform-docs /usr/local/bin/terraform-docs #********************* ShellCheck ***************************************** ARG SHELLCHECK_VERSION="stable" RUN set -ex \ && wget -qO- "https://github.com/koalaman/shellcheck/releases/download/${SHELLCHECK_VERSION?}/shellcheck-${SHELLCHECK_VERSION?}.linux.x86_64.tar.xz" | tar -xJv \ && cp "shellcheck-${SHELLCHECK_VERSION}/shellcheck" /usr/bin/ \ && shellcheck --version ...
-
Ask HN: Popular open source tool originally written in Haskell?
ShellCheck: https://github.com/koalaman/shellcheck
-
Google ZX – A tool for writing better scripts
If I want to write better shell scripts I usually run shellcheck and adjust accordingly or if I need facilities not provided by the shell i switch to a full fledged programming language. Ans oh yes, `sh` is present almost on every BSD and Linux box for free so I consider it an important thing to at least be comfortable with.
shellcheck: https://www.shellcheck.net/
-
How I use Nix in my Elm projects
When I run nix-shell at the root of the project it puts me in a Nix shell that contains, among other programs, caddy and shellcheck. Notice that in the shellHook I add the project's shell scripts to the PATH. So once I'm in the Nix shell I can, among other things:
-
Shellcheck finds bugs in your shell scripts
The error checks can be pretty arcane:
https://github.com/koalaman/shellcheck/wiki/Checks
zsh was originally supported, but unceremoniously removed: https://github.com/koalaman/shellcheck/issues/298
I've had great experiences with this tool, but, for some reason, this issue always makes me question taking too great a dependency on it.
-
Is there a syntax checker?
Similar to for instance shellcheck to check the syntax of shell scripts, is there an equivalent for the set of roff commands typically used in a (Linux) man page? I'm aware that e.g. pandoc permits the conversion of an other format (e.g., org) to both roff man and roff ms.
-
Ask HN: How does one practice day to day shell scripting
I forgot to mention "shellcheck" at https://www.shellcheck.net/ and the explanation of its error codes at https://www.shellcheck.net/wiki/
This is also referenced by Shotts, and has been discussed on Hacker News -- not to be missed.
-
Ask HN: Share a shell script you like
shellcheck, whilst not a script itself, I do find it useful when writing them.
What are some alternatives?
bash-language-server - A language server for Bash
nushell - A new type of shell
shfmt - Dockernized shfmt. This formats shell script.
shellharden - The corrective bash syntax highlighter
fish-shell - The user-friendly command line shell.
ipython - Official repository for IPython itself. Other repos in the IPython organization contain things like the website, documentation builds, etc.
shfmt - A shell formatter (sh/bash/mksh)
PowerShell - PowerShell for every system!
oh-my-bash - A delightful community-driven framework for managing your bash configuration, and an auto-update tool so that makes it easy to keep up with the latest updates from the community.
zx - A tool for writing better scripts
neomake - Asynchronous linting and make framework for Neovim/Vim