workflow-kotlin VS architecture-components-samples

For example square has open sourced workflow https://github.com/square/workflow-kotlin (MVI + plugin based architecture), if you look other examples like molecule they use Presenters (not the MVP ones) which is completly different. The only common thing is that they are both UDF.

workflow. Quite a shift in how you write an app, but enough extension points that it's not that much of an issue, and it's really pleasant to use.

I don't know how common/popular it actually is, but it's definitely not uncommon. Square has been doing this kind of home-made navigation for quite a while as far as I know (most recently in the form of workflow-kotlin), Lyft (Scoop) as well, and more (e.g. Conductor).

We'll focus on Jetpack Navigation here, however most of the content applies for any navigation library or tap action. In fact, I first implemented this at Square on top of Flow and Workflow.

There's kotlin workflow by square https://github.com/square/workflow-kotlin

https://github.com/android/architecture-components-samples/ was historically better

uh, maybe https://github.com/android/architecture-components-samples/tree/a87535608564103423415baddb1e586f0337be44/LiveDataSample/app/src/main/java/com/android/example/livedatabuilder

But Google invented a set of guidelines in "Guide to App Architecture" in 2017 which you can see here in action that after the re-org the new devrels didn't really understand so they ended up making their own version of "clean architecture" where the data layer depends on the domain layer and not vice versa, + never learned how top-level layering like this doesn't even scale ever and they should be creating components, not "layers".

5.) check the https://github.com/android/architecture-components-samples/ repo for samples (if it is a Google library, and only for some things)

When I take the advanced navigation project and update it's dependency to navigation 2.4.0 we get the working backstack as shown here.

That's still an issue .

Hey guys, Im trying to recognise more about api calls in a contemporary architecture. I am using retrofit with livedata/coroutines to make my api calls, but I'm struggling with error handling. Most of the solutions I find, even in googles own example, includes writing a wrapper around your api request and handle the error that. It seems overly complicated and frankly stupid to do something like that for, what I consider at least, rudimentary functionality. Even with Dart/Flutter, google has made this easy ‏‏‎ with async/await and Futures. Am I being lazy to think that if even google needs to write extra code to solve a common use case, they should probably add it to the framework? I dont know, maybe I just needed venting.. what do you think? google's project: https://github.com/android/architecture-components-samples/tree/master/GithubBrowserSample

/uj if you're reeeeaaaalyyyy interested, I found them here lol