workbox VS SweetAlert

We use the Workbox library and its utilities as a foundation for our service worker.

Btw, Workbox is effectively deprecated now. The dev in charge of it left Google for a real company 6+ months ago and no one has filled his shoes. The other day, the lady who is "maintaining" it now finally acknowledged that nothing is going to happen to it any time soon. https://github.com/GoogleChrome/workbox/issues/3149

Start from the https://github.com/GoogleChrome/workbox

Look into Workbox if you're okay writing code for that or Progressier otherwise.

If you want to try some of these patterns, you can use the https://developers.google.com/web/tools/workbox library that provides all the features out-of-the-box.

Here is an example using workbox.

I recently had a tiny website project which I wanted to make available offline. This is achieved by adding a Service Worker. And thanks to projects like workbox, getting basic functionality like caching for offline-use is fairly easy to set up.

SweetAlert is a gorgeous notification library you can use to replace built-in alert function in your JavaScript applications. You can include buttons and icons, alter the text’s color, and even add alerts that adjust in response to user clicks.

Are you sure you're using SweetAlert2 and not SweetAlert1 because your syntax looks like 1.

SourceCode | Demo

Import Sweet Alert to your project

sweetalert:

Sweet Alert - A beautiful replacement for success messages, error messages or info messages

Big question, though: Are you using SweetAlert, or SweetAlert2 ?