woof VS libretto

Compare woof vs libretto and see what are their differences.

woof

A pure Scala 3 logging library with no reflection (by LEGO)
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
woof libretto
5 2
424 190
0.2% -
8.2 9.4
8 days ago 11 days ago
Scala Scala
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later Mozilla Public License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

woof

Posts with mentions or reviews of woof. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-10-22.

libretto

Posts with mentions or reviews of libretto. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-07-15.
  • Synit – A Reactive Operating System
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 15 Jul 2023
    I'm not sure this is actually easy to solve. The basic idea here seems to be that actors coordinate with the help of shared mutable state (the "dataspace"). At this point you're actually back to square one as synchronizing shared state is the core problem with distributed, concurrent systems…

    Given that, and the fact that this whole thingy is untyped makes me skeptical. Not even the std. ingredients like type-state, session types, behavioral types, or the like seem to get used. I also don't see linear types here, which go very well with session types / behavioral types, and can help making typing message passing easier.

    Also that this approach would be completely network transparent, as I see it, seems like a design flaw. One needs control over the various effects that can occur! Otherwise the points form "distributed systems future work" can't be solved, imho.

    And form the practical point of view: There is no Akka / Pekko based Scala implementation? I'm quite surprised, to be honest.

    Akka / Pekko is the actor runtime, and Scala is famous for it's eDSL features; besides of course its type-system, which makes thing like Libretto possible, which seems related here:

    https://github.com/TomasMikula/libretto

    Syndicate-lang looks OTOH more like the usual callback-hell.

    But like I've said, I don't get this whole thingy really. I've just clicked through some parts of the web-sites. Most likely I'm just overlooking the elephant in the room. So would be glad to learn more!

    (BTW: Very nice web-site design on all the projects. Especially nice typography. Really enjoyed this part while clicking through this stuff.)

  • New Scala 3 Codebases
    6 projects | /r/scala | 17 Feb 2022

What are some alternatives?

When comparing woof and libretto you can also consider the following projects:

dotty-cps-async - experimental CPS transformer for dotty

kafka-manager - CMAK is a tool for managing Apache Kafka clusters

dedav4s - Declarative Data Viz 4 Scala

braid-spec - Working area for Braid extensions to HTTP

sauerkraut - A reimagined scala-pickling in the Scala 3 world

sttp-oauth2 - OAuth2 client library implemented in Scala using sttp

topshell - TopShell - a purely functional, reactive scripting language

circe - Yet another JSON library for Scala

tvm-vta - Open, Modular, Deep Learning Accelerator

Scio - A Scala API for Apache Beam and Google Cloud Dataflow.

jsoniter-scala - Scala macros for compile-time generation of safe and ultra-fast JSON codecs