woodpecker VS Laminar

https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker

Is anyone using woodpecker? It's a self-hosted CI/CD server forked from Drone. Really good, and actively developed.

Run your own container registry, build and host everything yourself, dont rely on others. Docker for example has a option for that but imo its very basic and limited. Harbor is more advanced but still not overly complicated. You could add build workers to that and automate your entire pipeline, but maybe for a single image thats overkill. But good to have those options in the future. Things to look at for example: Gitea (lighter) / Gitlab (more heavy), Drone.io, Woodpecker

> I wish it had some sort of CI like github actions or bitbucket pipeline

I use Gitea with Drone CI and it works pretty well: https://www.drone.io/

Some might also prefer the Woodpecker CI fork due to the license: https://woodpecker-ci.org/

I setup Drone as a part of my migration away from GitLab Omnibus and have no complaints so far: https://blog.kronis.dev/articles/goodbye-gitlab-hello-gitea-...

https://woodpecker-ci.org/ Open source clone of drone.io

https://www.drone.io/ or the more open fork https://woodpecker-ci.org/

I’m trying to migrate of my personal repos from GitHub to Codeberg. The biggest problem is to find a replacement for GitHub Actions (the free offering is so generous), and my current solution for that is to self-host an instance of Woodpecker CI [1].

I’d like to see even more diversity in Git hosting beyond “let’s all migrate from X to Y”, and for that to happen, Forgejo (a soft fork of Gitea) has already began implementing federation [2].

[1]: http://woodpecker-ci.org/

The open source version of drone is https://woodpecker-ci.org/

*Laminar - I like how simple this is

I use Laminar CI for this: https://laminar.ohwg.net/

Delve into Laminar would be my suggestion.

I like Laminar as a lightweight, self-hosted CI solution.

For a lightweight solution, I like to recommend Laminar CI.

Laminar

Laminar is a lightweight and modular CI system licensed under GPLv3. I like that it allows me to build the CI solution that fits my given use case the best.

I find Laminar quite interesting in this space. It might help you too to build your own lightweight CI solution that does exactly what your use case requires.

My continuous integration / continuous deployoment system is based on Laminar CI (blog post series). It serves various purposes:

jftr: There is another project with this name which is deceptively similar, but also very different… (quoting the README): Laminar is a lightweight and modular Continuous Integration service for Linux. It is self-hosted and developer-friendly, eschewing a configuration UI in favour of simple version-controllable configuration files and scripts.