wolfssl
cipherscan
Our great sponsors
| wolfssl | cipherscan | |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | 2 | |
| 2,173 | 1,936 | |
| 2.1% | 0.6% | |
| 9.9 | 2.5 | |
| 3 days ago | 3 months ago | |
| C | Python | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 only | Mozilla Public License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
wolfssl
-
“Purchasing an arm”
Or something a bit more lightweight - https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl
- WolfSSL
- Security Advisory 2022-10-04-1 - wolfSSL buffer overflow during a TLS 1.3 handshake (CVE-2022-39173)
- Getting started with wolfssl
-
Ask HN: Can a TCP connection be MitM attacked if already established?
> I have no room for TLS on micro computer
How micro is your micro? There are embedded TLS stacks such as wolfSSL[1]. If you carefully select the cipher suite and certificate requirements, and perhaps limit TLS payload sizes, you may be able to fit on a lot more systems than you initially suspect. x.509 is expensive in code space though, if that's the constraint, you may do better with an application specific certificate replacement of some sort.
[1] https://www.wolfssl.com/
- The project with a single 11,000-line code file
- Information and learning resources for cryptography newcomers
-
CryptoLyzer: A comprehensive cryptographic settings analyzer
There are many notable open-source projects (SSLyze, CipherScan, testssl.sh, tls-scan, …) and several SaaS solutions (CryptCheck, CypherCraft, Hardenize, ImmuniWeb, Mozilla Observatory, SSL Labs, …) to do a security setting analysis, especially when we are talking about TLS, which is the most common and popular cryptographic protocol. However, most of these tools heavily depend on one or more versions of one or more cryptographic protocol libraries, like GnuTLS, OpenSSL, or wolfSSL. But why is this such a problem?
-
FOSS News International #2: November 8-145, 2021
wolfSSL 5.0.0
- WolfSSL Release 5.0.0
cipherscan
-
CryptoLyzer: A comprehensive cryptographic settings analyzer
There are many notable open-source projects (SSLyze, CipherScan, testssl.sh, tls-scan, …) and several SaaS solutions (CryptCheck, CypherCraft, Hardenize, ImmuniWeb, Mozilla Observatory, SSL Labs, …) to do a security setting analysis, especially when we are talking about TLS, which is the most common and popular cryptographic protocol. However, most of these tools heavily depend on one or more versions of one or more cryptographic protocol libraries, like GnuTLS, OpenSSL, or wolfSSL. But why is this such a problem?
-
A friendly reminder from the good guys at NSA to stop using obsolete TLS versions and cipher suites.
There is also Mozilla Cipherscan too.
What are some alternatives?
mbedTLS - An open source, portable, easy to use, readable and flexible TLS library, and reference implementation of the PSA Cryptography API. Releases are on a varying cadence, typically around 3 - 6 months between releases.
sslyze - Fast and powerful SSL/TLS scanning library.
esp-idf - Espressif IoT Development Framework. Official development framework for Espressif SoCs.
tls-scan - An Internet scale, blazing fast SSL/TLS scanner ( non-blocking, event-driven )
GmSSL - 支持国密SM2/SM3/SM4/SM9/SSL的密码工具箱
engine - A reference implementation of the Russian GOST crypto algorithms for OpenSSL
openssl - Provides SSL, TLS and general purpose cryptography.
SchannelConfiguration - Configure SChannel Security Settings via Group Policy
Crypto++ - free C++ class library of cryptographic schemes
cmcollctr - Collection Commander
pyOpenSSL -- A Python wrapper around the OpenSSL library - A Python wrapper around the OpenSSL library
testssl.sh - Testing TLS/SSL encryption anywhere on any port