Snowpack
DISCONTINUED
awesome-vite
Our great sponsors
- Appwrite - The open-source backend cloud platform
- Onboard AI - Learn any GitHub repo in 59 seconds
- Revelo Payroll - Free Global Payroll designed for tech teams
- InfluxDB - Collect and Analyze Billions of Data Points in Real Time
- Sonar - Write Clean JavaScript Code. Always.
Snowpack | awesome-vite | |
---|---|---|
69 | 31 | |
19,787 | 11,432 | |
- | 2.5% | |
8.4 | 0.0 | |
over 1 year ago | 4 days ago | |
JavaScript | JavaScript | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Snowpack
-
How to replace webpack & babel with Vite on a legacy React Typescript project
Then there was Webpack which seemed like it would be around for a while. Even after things like Parcel and Snowpack came on the scene people still recommended Webpack. I mean, it's still the backbone of create-react-app. An then, Vite was released.
-
State of the Web: Bundlers & Build Tools
Unbundled development utilizes native ESM support in browsers to offer an ultra-fast development experience. Unlike a traditional bundler which bundles everything in development, unbundled development transforms the code and rewrites import paths to the ESM compliant file path without bundling your code. Additionally, most bundlers that do this pre-bundle dependencies because that decreases the number of imports needed, and dependencies are unlikely to change often. The two most prominent bundlers that utilize unbundled development are Vite and Snowpack. Snowpack, created in 2019, was the first bundler to have an unbundled development experience. However, while Snowpack was popular for some time, this did not last forever. In 2020, the team behind Vue created Vite. Vite has many advantages over Snowpack, like the ease of use, speed, better optimization, and more. Additionally, popular projects like SvelteKit adopted Vite instead of Snowpack. All of this helped Vite pass Snowpack in downloads, and it now has more than 10x downloads compared to Snowpack. In fact, even Astro, a project created by the team behind Snowpack (be on the lookout for an article about Astro), is now using Vite. Overall, if you want fast, unbundled development, I recommend Vite.
-
What are the new and exciting tech for React projects for 2022?
I've been hearing good things about snowpack and have been wanting to give it a go myself as an alternative to webpack/babel
-
Converting to Vite (Part 1)
So how did we get here? Well, it's a good thing to describe alternatives considered when you add issues to a repo! Months ago, @0vortex described in Issue #1131 some opportunities for dependency updates that would require version 5 of webpack with our webpack configuration, and warned that the dependency management would probably be tricky. I fixated on an alternative that he mentioned about converting the project to use Snowpack. I had wanted to learn more about bundling tools, so I took a few days here and there after Thanksgiving and got Open Sauced mostly working with it (see PR #1320).
- npx create-react-app not working -- everything is deprecated
-
React 101: The Basics
I have written a post about setting up a React project using Parcel as a bundler which can give a more detailed walkthrough about getting a React application up and running from scratch. There are multiple ways to do this but some of the more common build tools include Webpack, Parcel, and Snowpack.
-
SolidJS on Snowpack – Quick Dev Guide
For more information about this issue, check these issue tickets: Issue 2998, Issue 3219, Issue 3243
-
Etsy’s Journey to TypeScript
The number of transforms that Babel is doing with an "evergreen" config ("last 2 browser versions") at this point is effectively miniscule. It's a massive toolchain for what increasing turns out to be a minimal amount of actual work. "Last 2 Browser Versions" is effectively everything through ES2019 at this point which covers almost all of the "modern JS syntax". If you aren't using custom transforms you might not be transforming anything that matters in Babel in 2021. I've seen a bunch of projects with huge Babel pipelines where the only actual transform was Typescript's type removal and at that point, if your codebase is entirely Typescript, Typescript has all the downlevel transforms you need "baked in" (and arguably a little bit cleaner and simpler to Babel's kitchen sink but also still somehow millions of plugins approach) and it's just setting Typescript's compile option to the ES level you are most comfortable with. (In 2021 that may even be as high as { "target": "es2019" } or higher in your tsconfig.json and even there Typescript's not going to even need to downlevel much.) Typescript can also transform TSX/JSX to JS without the need of Babel, if you are using React.
Even ES2015 modules which some people still think is the big reason to keep Babel around: a) has full Browser support if you use type="module", but most people still want to pack their JS because just about no one is assuming HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 yet, and b) Babel has never done module format transforms, that's always been the domain of your packer (webpack, parcel, rollup, snowpack, what have you).
If you are updating your project stack in 2021 right now my personal top recommendation is that I really like the approach of snowpack (https://www.snowpack.dev/): ES2105 modules with dev experience (which is great), great Typescript support, and a simpler overall config experience than most other options right now. (It uses esbuild under the hood rather than babel for dev and basic transforms/bundling. It can optionally piggy back webpack and parcel for Production bundling that needs more "power".) Especially that <script type='module"> dev experience feels great now (with Hot Module Reloading too) versus waiting for a full bundle even for dev builds.
-
Build your own component library with Svelte
SvelteKit uses Vite under the hood, which is quite surprising, as Sapper and most tools are developed using Snowpack. Vite 2 is framework-agnostic and designed with SSR at its core.
-
Angular Is Rotten to the Core
I've had some success with npm, snowpack, mocha, typescript as that sort of stack for more "vanilla" efforts that feel rather more "modern". I think mocha is easier and cleaner than jest. I like keeping all of my transpilation to just Typescript without needing a massive Babel install/pipeline. snowpack (https://www.snowpack.dev/) right now I think is in a sweet spot of a better "ES Module native" developer experience than webpack and has better defaults when left unconfigured. (So much so that while there are snowpack templates/generators provided by the project I mostly don't use them other than for reference.)
awesome-vite
- JavaScript Gom Jabbar
-
Seeking React TypeScript with Redux Toolkit GitHub Project for Learning Purposes
I suggest Vite community templates https://github.com/vitejs/awesome-vite
-
What are the biggest issues with Vue?
here
-
Suggestions needed to replace React-Scripts
I saw Vite but not sure how easy it is to switch to that from an existing project.
-
Build a SSR App with React, React Router and Vite
Vite - build tool that leverages the availability of ES Modules in the browser and compile-to-native bundler
-
[AskJS] Anyone using Linaria + Vite?
But since it demands an additional step during build, it has to be some sort of integration with the build tool. Currently I'm using React + Vite, so I wonder, does anyone currently use Linaria + Vite? If so, how?
-
Show HN: Integrated ViteJS SSR in Rust
Hi HN community,
One of the first requests I got for ‘create-rust-app’ was from a friend of mine regarding ViteJS. At the time, I didn’t know how awesome and fast ViteJS was as opposed to webpack and the name sounded like a JavaScript library so I didn’t really see the point. Upon a second review of the project, I realized the best thing I could do for the rust web dev community was to create an example of how to integrate ViteJS-based SSR in rust. And voilà, here it is. The docs also link to an “awesome list” which references create-rust-app [1].
This integration paves the way for things like adding multiple front end framework choices for the project and potentially doing SSG in rust.
[1] https://github.com/vitejs/awesome-vite#integrations-with-bac...
- Should i do a vue 3 project before jumping into nuxt?
- Awesome Vite.js - A curated list of awesome things related to Vite.js
-
Hibiki HTML – New Front end Framework (no scaffolding, no Webpack)
Vite [0] configures React, Vue and more perfectly out of the box
What are some alternatives?
webpack-bundle-analyzer - Webpack plugin and CLI utility that represents bundle content as convenient interactive zoomable treemap
vite - Next generation frontend tooling. It's fast!
Rollup - Next-generation ES module bundler
parcel - The zero configuration build tool for the web. 📦🚀
esbuild - An extremely fast bundler for the web
gulp - A toolkit to automate & enhance your workflow
webpack - A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows for loading parts of the application on demand. Through "loaders", modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.
rollup-plugin-visualizer - 📈⚖️ Visuallize your bundle
vite-tsconfig-paths - Support for TypeScript's path mapping in Vite
nivo - nivo provides a rich set of dataviz components, built on top of the awesome d3 and React libraries
plugins - 🍣 The one-stop shop for official Rollup plugins
astro - The web framework that scales with you — Build fast content sites, powerful web applications, dynamic server APIs, and everything in-between ⭐️ Star to support our work!