wire VS wild-workouts-go-ddd-example

We use https://github.com/google/wire for every bigger project, take a look at it, it beautifully solves initialisation and also gives you a guideline on how to do it.

Im by no means a "purist" in such things, I love my magic and QoL-features/libs, but havent seen something that is so easy to use in go, that I immediately wanted to add it. And to be fair, I only looked closely at https://github.com/google/wire , others I have just skipped - and I will be looking into uber-fx as mentioned in the other comment.

If you have such a complex and deep dependency graph, and you don't want to manually maintain it, you could use some DI library to handle that for you. Something like https://github.com/google/wire for small-medium size stuff, or https://github.com/uber-go/fx for larger scale, more enterprise projects.

Try https://github.com/google/wire. Compile time generated like dagger 2 in java.

Most people probably do it by hand (I do). But otherwise, probably https://github.com/google/wire is the most popular, maybe followed by https://github.com/uber-go/fx.

For larger object graphs do you roll everything by hand or encourage something like https://github.com/google/wire

The other thing is that I'm lazy, so I don't construct all dependencies in main.go manually but use wire to generate the construction of my dependency tree.

This guy fucks. Modular monoliths is the way. The service initialization/wiring part could be simplified (given a bigger project ofc) using something like https://github.com/google/wire. But everything else... *chef kiss* beautiful.

Take a look at: https://github.com/ThreeDotsLabs/wild-workouts-go-ddd-exampl...

(I’m one of the authors.)

This project shows how to apply more complex patterns popular in business applications while staying true to the Go ideas, and not copying them blindly from Java.

In the Go community, you’ll often hear people say „just keep things simple” beats all patterns and is all you need. This may be true if you write a CLI tool or a small library, but if you have a team maintaining a big application, some patterns are super helpful.

Here is a reference implementation by the same authors of the blog post you referenced: https://github.com/ThreeDotsLabs/wild-workouts-go-ddd-example/tree/master/internal/trainer.

In this case I recommend Three Dots Labs blog and Ardan Labs courses and blog posts.

As a rather new developer, I'm ashamed to admit that I struggle with this. I've seen the Dave Cheney writeup about it and I agree with your reasoning, but sometimes I end up in situations like this, where they wrote a server utility, put it into the common package and imported it into the services that need it. The issue I have is the organization of it all because the folder structure seems to make a clear separation of the core services from the utility package. If you have any ideas or tips to help avoid it, that'd be awesome!

Clean architecture is not tied to some specific paradigm. It's a way of thinking about programs that is common to almost every mature developer. Many developers use it without even knowing the name - they just came to it by themselves through many tries and errors. There is a good free book about using it in Go, called Go with the Domain if you interested.

Wild Workouts should match your needs: https://github.com/ThreeDotsLabs/wild-workouts-go-ddd-example

For Event-Driven / DDD / Microservice projects, take a look at this Github org https://github.com/ThreeDotsLabs and their blog detailing the techniques used https://threedots.tech .

Nice job at taking a stab at DDD in Go! You may want to check out https://github.com/ThreeDotsLabs/wild-workouts-go-ddd-example for some inspiration and learning around DDD and Go.