winfsp VS securefs

I’ve got a same sort of setup - difference is I have 2 Plex servers, one on the seedbox and one on a local Windows PC. Have you thought about mounting the seedbox locally? I use SSHFS and WinFSP which the seedbox I use supports - another route I took was using FreeFileSync which is an easy to use program that does all sorts of syncs.

In the Windows guest, install https://github.com/virtio-win/virtio-win-pkg-scripts/blob/master/README.md#downloads and also https://github.com/winfsp/winfsp/releases/latest.

when talking about rclone for Windows, I find it more than worthy to include WinFSP. It makes it much easier to access the drives mounted with rclone, and even using Windows File Explorer.

If you want to have that drive available in your Windows File Explorer you will need to install another open-source free software called WinFSP (for Windows File System Proxy) which can be downloaded from its website (https://winfsp.dev/), following this link.

You need WinFSP. It's basically the equivalent of FUSE but for Windows. (I think it actually has a FUSE-compatible API so that FUSE filesystems can in theory be ported to Windows easily - guessing rclone is probably using this function actually.)

There's cppcryptfs & securefs as Cryptomator alternatives too. SiriKali is an option for a GUI that works nicely with them.

There's also this: https://github.com/netheril96/securefs/

Well, time to advertise my own competing offering: https://github.com/netheril96/securefs. Works on Win, Linux, Mac and BSD.

I wasn’t satisfied with the options available, so I wrote my own: https://github.com/netheril96/securefs. It has authenticated encryption, highest quality of password stretching, and works on both Unix-like and Windows.

If it is not against the rules, I want to promote my project (https://github.com/netheril96/securefs) here. It is essentially the same functionality, but with authenticated encryption, better password hashing and optionally file size obfuscation (but no fancy UI).