wg-easy
wireguard-ui
Our great sponsors
wg-easy | wireguard-ui | |
---|---|---|
20 | 29 | |
11,511 | 3,504 | |
6.6% | - | |
9.8 | 8.0 | |
1 day ago | about 2 months ago | |
JavaScript | Go | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
wg-easy
-
PiHole after wireguard install?
Check out wg-easy on GitHub. There is also a wg with pinole on their page. Works so easily together. https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy
-
Alternative to Headscale?
sounds like you just want wg-easy.
-
WireHole is a combination of WireGuard, Pi-hole, and Unbound
This wg-easy?
Definitely not an OSI approved license, but does look like they made an attempt in the spirit of GPL, no?
https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy/blob/master/LICENSE.md
> You may:
Use this software for yourself;
Use this software for a company;
Modify this software, as long as you:
Publish the changes on GitHub as an open-source & linked fork;
Don't remove any links to the original project or donation pages;
You may not:
Use this software in a commercial product without a license from the original author;
- The Tailscale Universal Docker Mod
-
Who do you use for port forwarding?
wg-easy running in Docker. Then access it using WireGuard on my mobile devices.
-
Netmaker/Tailscale Vs Traditional VPNs
Just plain wg-easy (wireguard with frontend). No 3rd parties involved, just me & my endpoint
-
Is it possible to make a phone connect to a server without having to open any ports on the server side ?
I suggest running a VPN server like wireguard (very easy to install on phone and set up using https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy) and have the port open only to that. The VPN will do the rest in terms of NATing ports and whatnot.
- Which is more of a pain in the ass: connecting to databases via SSH tunnels, or whitelisting IP addresses?
-
Self-Hosted Mesh Network / VPN For User-Friendly LAN Gaming Network?
https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy (7.6k stars)
-
Changing Private IP to domain or something locally for selfhosted RSS-Bridge?
I use wg-easy for now https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy
wireguard-ui
-
IPv6 Breaks Android Apps
# This file was generated using wireguard-ui (https://github.com/ngoduykhanh/wireguard-ui) # Please don't modify it manually, otherwise your change might get replaced. [Interface] Address = 10.25.0.1/24,2001:db8:abcd:AA10::1/60 ListenPort = 51820 PrivateKey = MTU = 1420 PostUp = iptables -A FORWARD -i wg0 -o wg0 -j ACCEPT PostUp = iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.25.0.0/24 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE PostUp = iptables -A INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 51820 -j ACCEPT PostDown = Table = auto [Peer] PublicKey = PresharedKey = AllowedIPs = 10.25.0.2/32,192.168.32.0/24,192.168.56.0/24,2001:db8:abcd:aa11::/64 # AllowedIPs are for site to site connection [Peer] PublicKey = PresharedKey = AllowedIPs = 10.25.0.3/32,10.0.0.0/16,2001:db8:abcd:aa12::/64 [Peer] PublicKey = PresharedKey = AllowedIPs = 10.25.0.4/32,2001:db8:abcd:aa13::/64 [Peer] PublicKey = PresharedKey = AllowedIPs = 10.25.0.5/32,2001:db8:abcd:aa14::/64 [Peer] PublicKey = PresharedKey = AllowedIPs = 10.25.0.6/32,2001:db8:abcd:aa15::/64
-
Wireguard - how are you generating client configurations for your users?
My previous experience was using this wireguard-ui container, super easy to create clients, and spits out a config file and/or QR code. Couldn't be any easier and removes all of the mumbo jumbo from the client's hands. And how that I'm looking at that package again I think I could potentially map it to the router's API, assuming there is one available for the VPN configs.
-
wireguard not connecting
Wireguard log Uname info: Linux wireguard 6.2.0-20-generic #20-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Apr 6 07:48:48 UTC 2023 x86_64 GNU/Linux 2023-08-13 22:01:40 **** It seems the wireguard module is already active. Skipping kernel header install and module compilation. **** 2023-08-13 22:01:41 **** Server mode is selected **** 2023-08-13 22:01:41 **** PersistentKeepalive will be set for: all **** 2023-08-13 22:01:42 **** SERVERURL var is either not set or is set to "auto", setting external IP to auto detected value of 78.72.85.114 **** 2023-08-13 22:01:42 **** External server port is set to 51820. Make sure that port is properly forwarded to port 51820 inside this container **** 2023-08-13 22:01:42 **** Internal subnet is set to 10.13.13.0 **** 2023-08-13 22:01:42 **** AllowedIPs for peers 0.0.0.0/0 **** 2023-08-13 22:01:42 **** PEERDNS var is either not set or is set to "auto", setting peer DNS to 10.13.13.1 to use wireguard docker host's DNS. **** 2023-08-13 22:01:42 **** Server mode is selected **** 2023-08-13 22:01:42 **** No changes to parameters. Existing configs are used. **** 2023-08-13 22:01:42 [custom-init] No custom files found, skipping... 2023-08-13 22:01:46 .:53 2023-08-13 22:01:46 CoreDNS-1.10.1 2023-08-13 22:01:46 linux/amd64, go1.20.7, 2023-08-13 22:01:47 [#] ip link add wg0 type wireguard 2023-08-13 22:01:47 [#] wg setconf wg0 /dev/fd/63 2023-08-13 22:01:47 [#] ip -4 address add 10.13.13.1 dev wg0 2023-08-13 22:01:47 [#] ip link set mtu 1420 up dev wg0 2023-08-13 22:01:47 [#] ip -4 route add 10.13.13.5/32 dev wg0 2023-08-13 22:01:47 [#] ip -4 route add 10.13.13.4/32 dev wg0 2023-08-13 22:01:47 [#] ip -4 route add 10.13.13.3/32 dev wg0 2023-08-13 22:01:47 [#] ip -4 route add 10.13.13.2/32 dev wg0 2023-08-13 22:01:47 [#] iptables -A FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; iptables -A FORWARD -o wg0 -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth+ -j MASQUERADE 2023-08-13 22:01:47 [ls.io-init] done. wireguard ui logs 2023-08-13 21:50:03 ⇨ http server started on [::]:5000 2023-08-13 22:01:20 [#] ip link delete dev wg0 2023-08-13 22:01:21 [#] iptables -D FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -o wg0 -j MASQUERADE 2023-08-13 22:01:27 [#] ip link add wg0 type wireguard 2023-08-13 22:01:27 [#] wg setconf wg0 /dev/fd/63 2023-08-13 22:01:27 [#] ip -4 address add 10.252.1.0/24 dev wg0 2023-08-13 22:01:27 [#] ip link set mtu 1450 up dev wg0 2023-08-13 22:01:27 [#] iptables -A FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o wg0 -j MASQUERADE 2023-08-13 22:01:29 Wireguard UI 2023-08-13 22:01:29 App Version : dev 2023-08-13 22:01:29 Git Commit : b55543f 2023-08-13 22:01:29 Git Ref : N/A 2023-08-13 22:01:29 Build Time : 08-13-2023 20:01:29 2023-08-13 22:01:29 Git Repo : https://github.com/ngoduykhanh/wireguard-ui 2023-08-13 22:01:29 Authentication : true 2023-08-13 22:01:29 Bind address : 0.0.0.0:5000 2023-08-13 22:01:29 Email from : 2023-08-13 22:01:29 Email from name : WireGuard UI 2023-08-13 22:01:29 Custom wg.conf : 2023-08-13 22:01:29 Base path : / 2023-08-13 22:01:29 ⇨ http server started on [::]:5000
-
Remote multi user editing
you can always setup wireguard on your vps. its not that hard, this article by digital ocean article is quite thorough. That article has a lot on information so it looks harder than it actually is. You could also use something like this to help set things up faster. ive used that ui before but dont actively host it, only when i need to add peers. If you do actively host the ui make sure you dont expose it to the internet. Not because there is some security issue just because its imo not best practice. You can also use hamachi or any of the other hamachi like services
-
Wireguard without VPS?
Maybe this, https://github.com/ngoduykhanh/wireguard-ui
-
unable to route traffic via Wireguard tunnel
I have 2 VPS servers running Debian 11. I have installed Wireguard, and Wureguard UI I can connect those two sites, but there is no traffic going between them. I want to create Site to site tunnel. And than later I Will also want to create Client VPN so I can use it on my laptop when needed. but currently I am not able to get any traffic between those 2 VPS servers.
-
Help needed with setup to local network
A couple of days ago I stumbled upon this awesome project (https://github.com/ngoduykhanh/wireguard-ui). I immediately tried to get it running in order to access my local home network from the outside.
-
ngoduykhanh / wireguard-ui - Default Client Subnet
# This file was generated using wireguard-ui (https://github.com/ngoduykhanh/wireguard-ui)
-
Wireguard container and ngoduykhanh / wireguard-ui
Hello, i am running wireguard in a container on a raspberry4 with the docker-compose.yml from linuxserver. I'd like now to use a gui but I am stuck with the docker-compose example from ngoduykhanh / wireguard-ui
-
Add WireGuard VPN on my exicting PI-hole+unbound ubuntu DNS server on my old laptop.
Personally, I’ve stopped using pi VPN quite a while ago. I’ve only used there console interface. Don’t know if there’s a official GUI by now. But there are a few gui alternatives available. I’ve been using this: https://github.com/ngoduykhanh/wireguard-ui
What are some alternatives?
pivpn - The Simplest VPN installer, designed for Raspberry Pi
wg-ui - WireGuard Web UI for self-serve client configurations, with optional auth.
firezone - Open-source VPN server and egress firewall for Linux built on WireGuard. Firezone is easy to set up (all dependencies are bundled thanks to Chef Omnibus), secure, performant, and self hostable.
wg-easy - The easiest way to run WireGuard VPN + Web-based Admin UI. [Moved to: https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy]
wg-manager - A easy to use WireGuard dashboard and management tool
wg-portal - WireGuard Configuration Portal with LDAP connection
wg-gen-web - Simple Web based configuration generator for WireGuard
WGDashboard - Simplest dashboard for WireGuard VPN written in Python w/ Flask
Wireguard-Manager-and-API - A Wireguard VPN Server Manager and API to add and remove clients
prometheus_wireguard_exporter - A Prometheus exporter for WireGuard, written in Rust.
watchman - Watches files and records, or triggers actions, when they change.