wg-best-practices-os-developers VS serverless-graphql

Compare wg-best-practices-os-developers vs serverless-graphql and see what are their differences.

wg-best-practices-os-developers

The Best Practices for OSS Developers working group is dedicated to raising awareness and education of secure code best practices for open source developers. (by ossf)

serverless-graphql

Serverless GraphQL Examples for AWS AppSync and Apollo (by serverless)
Our great sponsors
  • SurveyJS - Open-Source JSON Form Builder to Create Dynamic Forms Right in Your App
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
wg-best-practices-os-developers serverless-graphql
14 215
604 2,704
4.7% 0.0%
9.7 0.0
about 22 hours ago about 1 year ago
JavaScript JavaScript
Apache License 2.0 MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

wg-best-practices-os-developers

Posts with mentions or reviews of wg-best-practices-os-developers. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-11-30.
  • Compiler Options Hardening Guide for C and C++
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 30 Nov 2023
    https://github.com/ossf/wg-best-practices-os-developers/issu...

    The idea of using `-fsanitize-minimal-runtime` is interesting. I don't have any direct experience with that option. I've created an issue to investigate maybe adding that to the guide. Thanks for the tip!

  • OSCM: The Open Source Consumption Manifesto
    4 projects | dev.to | 4 Sep 2023
    These are technical details that are out of the scope of this article, but we think that it is important to mention them because the security strategy of a company should be based on a solid foundation, and these frameworks show that there are already some good starting points, companies don't have to start from scratch. If you want to know more about them or other ways to improve the security of your software supply chain, visit the OpenSSF website.
  • Best practices for effective attack surface analysis
    2 projects | dev.to | 19 Jul 2023
    Participating in the cybersecurity community can be a useful way to gain information about security trends and possible risks. Organizations such as the OWASP, OpenSSF, SANS Institute, and ISC2 promote the exchange of information between organizations and can raise the alarm about emerging issues or hacking strategies.
  • Wake-up call: why it's urgent to deal with your hardcoded credentials
    2 projects | dev.to | 30 Oct 2022
    Today corporations, open source projects, nonprofit foundations, and even governments are all trying to figure out how to improve the global software supply chain security. While these efforts are more than welcome, for the moment, there is hardly any straightforward way for organizations to improve on that front.
  • 'Securing Open Source Software Act' Introduced to US Senate
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 23 Sep 2022
  • Great Time at JavaZone 2022
    3 projects | dev.to | 14 Sep 2022
    Cross industry best practices - openssf.org
  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (June 2022)
    22 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 1 Jun 2022
  • runk
    4 projects | /r/BrandNewSentence | 9 May 2022
    The Open Source Security Foundation is the continuation(?) of the group CII that was originally founded after this mess came to light. Can't say anything about the salary, but they're currently hiring for a few positions.
  • Ask HN: Is funding the actual problem for healthy Open Source?
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 4 Feb 2022
    TL;DR: Is there any data to suggest that funding an Open Source project materially benefits the users of that project? If you know of any, please share!

    This is a question that has been on my mind ever since Log4Shell. I want to know if funding could have an impact on preventing major vulnerabilities or if the issue is something else (lack of guidance for projects, too many cooks, rampant dev ADHD, etc).

    It seems like a lot of people are talking about this[0][1] and how funding Open Source would help, but I'm concerned that it's simply wishful thinking that money alone would solve the problem. Sometimes reality is cruel like that.

    Is it possible that more funding would help prevent the next Log4Shell or Heartbleed? Maybe! Or are we simply touting a solution, without any data, and our hubris could actually end up hurting security further by just having companies "wash their hands" of responsibility? If FAANG/Fortune 500 throws money over the fence at developers, how much of that money will actually translate into improving the Open Source software?

    I personally believe that funding would _help_ with the security of Open Source software. And it would also help with documentation, support, and a number of other "health problems", all of which would likely help with security. But I'm also concerned that this could backfire too in spectacular ways (increased library proliferation to get funding, people pocketing it for a vacation, hackers targeting popular, dormant libs to harvest money from them, etc).

    I'm not aware of any actual research/data to provide evidence around improving Open Source security. That's why I wanted to ask y'all. Hacker News is a pretty small community and I wouldn't be surprised if somebody from OpenSSF[2] chimed in to help answer this, lol.

    Beyond funding, there are also some projects that I've found like CHAOSS[3][4] that seem to be thinking about quantifying risk for Open Source dependencies and other problems like the "bus factor". It doesn't matter if you fund a project if the dev behind it MIA.

    If this data doesn't exist, then it's something that I'll likely start investing my time into generating. (I'm working on some Open Source tooling for dealing with managing dependency security[5] that follows up the Log4Shell tooling we also built[6], which is why this has been on my mind a lot recently.)

    Anyway, if you're interested in brainstorming about this further, please shoot me an email (on my profile). Cheers!

    0: https://www.wsj.com/articles/protect-open-source-software-prevention-oss-public-use-cybersecurity-innovation-cyberattack-apache-log4j-11643316125

    1: https://blog.google/technology/safety-security/making-open-source-software-safer-and-more-secure/

    2: https://openssf.org/

    3: https://chaoss.community/

    4: https://chaoss.community/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/English-Release-2021-10-21.pdf

    (Search for "Business Risk" or use the Nav to find the section about how they're attempting to measure the security of Open Source packages)

    5: https://github.com/lunasec-io/lunasec/tree/master/lunatrace

    (This is under active development and is something that is a week or two away from being polished enough for serious usage.)

    6: https://github.com/lunasec-io/lunasec/tree/master/lunatrace/cli/cmd/log4shell

  • Can Some one here verify whether it is true or false? I saw this passage on Quora. It looks Kinda funny to me.
    3 projects | /r/linux | 20 Jan 2022
    https://openssf.org/ "OSTIF enhances security for users everywhere. We do this through security reviews. (...) reviews have resulted in hundreds of bug patches, including over 20 with a Critical or High severity."

serverless-graphql

Posts with mentions or reviews of serverless-graphql. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-12.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing wg-best-practices-os-developers and serverless-graphql you can also consider the following projects:

LocalStack - 💻 A fully functional local AWS cloud stack. Develop and test your cloud & Serverless apps offline

Serverless-Boilerplate-Express-TypeScript - 🚀🎉📚 Boilerplate and Starter for Serverless framework, ExpressJS, TypeScript, Prisma and MongoDB ⚡️ Made with developer experience first: Serverless framework + Live reload + Offline support + ExpressJS + TypeScript + ESLint + Prettier + Husky + Commitlint + Lint-Staged + Jest + Dotenv + esbuild + VSCode

copilot-cli - The AWS Copilot CLI is a tool for developers to build, release and operate production ready containerized applications on AWS App Runner or Amazon ECS on AWS Fargate.

terraform - Terraform enables you to safely and predictably create, change, and improve infrastructure. It is a source-available tool that codifies APIs into declarative configuration files that can be shared amongst team members, treated as code, edited, reviewed, and versioned.

electrodb - A DynamoDB library to ease the use of modeling complex hierarchical relationships and implementing a Single Table Design while keeping your query code readable.

chalice - Python Serverless Microframework for AWS

hotwire-rails - Use Hotwire in your Ruby on Rails app

middy - 🛵 The stylish Node.js middleware engine for AWS Lambda 🛵

dynamodb-onetable - DynamoDB access and management for one table designs with NodeJS

tailwindcss-typography - Beautiful typographic defaults for HTML you don't control.

mangum - AWS Lambda support for ASGI applications

subscriptions-transport-ws - :arrows_clockwise: A WebSocket client + server for GraphQL subscriptions