quokka
Tailwind CSS
Our great sponsors
quokka | Tailwind CSS | |
---|---|---|
31 | 1,275 | |
1,167 | 78,166 | |
1.6% | 2.1% | |
1.8 | 9.4 | |
over 2 years ago | 1 day ago | |
TypeScript | ||
- | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
quokka
-
Quokka Playground - Run JavaScript and TypeScript in VS Code
For more features and details check out the official docs https://quokkajs.com/
- Quokka.js: The JavaScript Playground in Your Editor
-
IDEs vs Text Editors in 2023 for Web Dev: what things have you found full size IDE's like Webstorm can do that VSCode cannot in 2023 which make you more productive? Specially today now that TypeScript + AI coding tools level the playing field even further.
Used to be true, but between Quokka.js for quick prototypes, Wallaby.js for running tests smartly within the IDE, and now Console Ninja which enables inline console.log within the VSCode while running servers for common tooling (webpack, vite). As well as continuously improving collaboration tools like Live Share, And it's become hard for me to find an argument that Webstorm is still better for productivity here.
- SREPL: The file is the REPL
-
I built a tool that let you quickly test JavaScript code suitable for teaching and learning JavaScript
I use https://quokkajs.com/ it has a free version!
-
Use Go in my start-up or stick to TS which I already know?
There are some fantastic tools such as Quokka which make "more algorithmic" development very interactive and fun
-
How to see what the code is doing?
There's also extensions like https://quokkajs.com/
-
Any way to have inline code analysis like this? I believe the Trunk extension does it.
Quokka.js
-
I'd like to use a REPL in my workflow for getting feedback on my code. Is this a reasonable ask? If not, how do you check your code as you go?
I’m a Clojure(script) dev learning TS. My Clojure REPL flow is Cursive + IntelliJ. The closest equivalent I’ve found is https://quokkajs.com for inline evaluation and https://wallabyjs.com for test evaluation. Both are paid products but have free 30 day evaluation periods. Both work in IntelliJ and VsCode.
-
[AskJS] Confused and Struggling
If you want to code and practice your JS in a sandbox, I highly recommend using VS Code (if you're not already using that for your HTML/CSS) in conjunction with Quokka.js. If you use `console.log()` function to log your results, Quokka will output directly in the editor. There are online resources that do something similar like codesandbox.io but I've found it nice to have a local environment.
Tailwind CSS
-
ChatCrafters - Chat with AI powered personas
This app was built with Svelte Kit, Tailwind CSS, and many other technologies. For a full rundown, please visit the GitHub repository
-
Mojo CSS vs. Tailwind: Choosing the best CSS framework
Unlike Tailwind, which has over 77,000 stars on GitHub, Mojo CSS has about 200 stars on GitHub. But the Mojo CSS documentation is fairly good and you can find most of the information you’ll need there.
-
Collab Lab #66 Recap
JavaScript React Flowbite Tailwind Firebase - Auth, Database, and Hosting Vite
-
Show HN: Brutalisthackernews.com – A HN reader inspired by brutalist web design
- Performance is a feature.
Another common interpretation of brutalism is aesthetic, reacting to overly complicated user interfaces by creating simpler, more direct ones. Tailwind CSS (https://tailwindcss.com), one of today's most popular CSS libraries, promotes this approach in its component examples. There's also a neat library I've seen recently called "Neobrutalism Components" for React that I like (https://neobrutalism-components.vercel.app), providing components with a similar look and feel to Gumroad. This might more accurately be called 'Neo-Brutalism,' as noted in the comments.
A more engineering-centric interpretation of Brutalism focuses on form, structure, and efficiency, drawing significantly from brutalist architecture principles. Apart from the user interface itself, most mobile, desktop, and web applications are extremely bloated and often perform worse than sites from 10 years ago did. While one HTML file might be "less brutalist" than the original HN site, it is substantially more brutalist than any HN mobile app in existence, and offers nearly identical functionality.
A broader interpretation of brutalism, which could be termed 'Meta-Brutalism,' is embodied in the overall experience on this site through UX flows. Yes, in the strictest sense, the original HN site is more Brutalist in many ways, but it only shows 30 articles at a time and does not function as a PWA. For this site, the experience of reading 10 stories is arguably less brutalist, but for quickly browsing through several pages and skimming articles (which is how I read HN) it is a lot faster, and in my opinion, more Brutalist.
My primary inspiration was addressing software and tool bloat in UIs rather than strictly adhering to every principle set forth by David Bryant Copeland. I don't find it convincing that this site "isn't brutalist" compared to really any other experience apart from the Main HN site, and I would argue the overall experience is more brutalist in its performance and scrolling behavior.
As a side note: I generally don't like Brutalist architecture that much although I believe it is unfairly maligned. I visited the Salk Institute once and enjoyed it though (https://www.archdaily.com/61288/ad-classics-salk-institute-l...).
-
Ask HN: Who is hiring? (April 2024)
- Staff Software Engineer ($275k/yr): https://tailwindcss.com/careers/staff-software-engineer
We're small, independent, and profitable, with a team of just 6 people doing millions in revenue, and growing sustainably every year. You'd work directly with the founders on open-source software used by millions of people.
If you like the idea of working on a small team that cares about craft and isn't trying to achieve VC scale, I think this is a pretty awesome place to do your best work.
-
Deploy a Golang serverless function for a demo form with htmx
Instead of Booststrap, I used Tailwind CSS as the CSS library.
-
Shared Tailwind Setup For Micro Frontend Application with Nx Workspace
Tailwind CSS: A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom designs.
-
Building a Dynamic Job Board with Issues Github, Next.js, Tailwind CSS and MobX-State-Tree
Basic knowledge of Tailwind CSS and MobX-State-Tree
-
CSS Styling (Next.js)
Tailwind is a CSS framework that speeds up the development process by allowing you to quickly write utility classes directly in your TSX markup.
-
Open-source timepicker components for Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS
What are some alternatives?
RunJS - RunJS is a JavaScript playground for macOS, Windows and Linux. Write code with instant feedback and access to Node.js and browser APIs.
flowbite - Open-source UI component library and front-end development framework based on Tailwind CSS
JS-Interpreter - A sandboxed JavaScript interpreter in JavaScript.
antd - An enterprise-class UI design language and React UI library
vscode-python - Python extension for Visual Studio Code
unocss - The instant on-demand atomic CSS engine.
gtoolkit - Glamorous Toolkit is the Moldable Development environment. It empowers you to make systems explainable through experiences tailored for each problem.
windicss - Next generation utility-first CSS framework.
typescript-notebook - Run JavaScript and TypeScript in node.js within VS Code notebooks with excellent support for debugging, tensorflowjs visulizations, plotly, danfojs, etc
emotion - 👩🎤 CSS-in-JS library designed for high performance style composition
jupyter - Jupyter metapackage for installation, docs and chat
Material UI - Ready-to-use foundational React components, free forever. It includes Material UI, which implements Google's Material Design.