quokka VS JS-Interpreter

For more features and details check out the official docs https://quokkajs.com/

Used to be true, but between Quokka.js for quick prototypes, Wallaby.js for running tests smartly within the IDE, and now Console Ninja which enables inline console.log within the VSCode while running servers for common tooling (webpack, vite). As well as continuously improving collaboration tools like Live Share, And it's become hard for me to find an argument that Webstorm is still better for productivity here.

I use https://quokkajs.com/ it has a free version!

There are some fantastic tools such as Quokka which make "more algorithmic" development very interactive and fun

There's also extensions like https://quokkajs.com/

Quokka.js

I’m a Clojure(script) dev learning TS. My Clojure REPL flow is Cursive + IntelliJ. The closest equivalent I’ve found is https://quokkajs.com for inline evaluation and https://wallabyjs.com for test evaluation. Both are paid products but have free 30 day evaluation periods. Both work in IntelliJ and VsCode.

If you want to code and practice your JS in a sandbox, I highly recommend using VS Code (if you're not already using that for your HTML/CSS) in conjunction with Quokka.js. If you use `console.log()` function to log your results, Quokka will output directly in the editor. There are online resources that do something similar like codesandbox.io but I've found it nice to have a local environment.

JS-based JavaScript interpreter — even though it was a more reassuring option for me (especially with some projects already available in this space), a JS interpreter written in JS simply isn’t a performant solution;

See: #242

Each program is written in JavaScript and interpreted by JS-Interpreter. A step() function of JS-Interpreter is applied to each program alternately.

Here you are, its A JS Interpreter written in JS https://github.com/NeilFraser/JS-Interpreter

Haha, both of those cases are killing both the iframe and the UI. I have to get around to using totally different domain on the iframe to really take advantage of the Chrome process isolation. Previously I was using a really nice JS interpreter written in JS[0] before to solve that problem, but it ran 200 times slower than the browser interpreter(!)

[0] https://github.com/NeilFraser/JS-Interpreter

I don't care what current level he is he could Learn and use a "proper" already sanetized interpreter like https://github.com/NeilFraser/JS-Interpreter and implement it by a command sending the result back it demends a real level in Javascript but if he really wants to do it he could. But if you rly wanna drag down someone on his level for no reason go on I am not judge on here and btw I don't advertise I just provide info and links to people / servers whitch did it or here a way to do it. If you are rly that dumb or think you are the only one able to think properly here I invite you to get outta here ;) and as always have a great rest of your day :) I don't consider the invite as advertising taking that taking as point that it is a community server on the subject of this subreadit.