rfcs VS solid

```

We started experimenting with this ling of thought almost 3 years ago:

- First take (ref sugar), Nov 2020: https://github.com/vuejs/rfcs/pull/228

- Take 2, Aug 2021: https://github.com/vuejs/rfcs/pull/368

- Take 3, Nov 2021: https://github.com/vuejs/rfcs/discussions/369

We provided it as an experimental feature and had a decent number of users trying it out in production. The feedback wasn't great and eventually decided to drop it. https://github.com/vuejs/rfcs/discussions/369#discussioncomm...

This is a personal preference, but I use ref almost all the time. Despite tediously writing the .value to access the ref’s value, the Vue team is aware of the problem, and the open RFC - Reactivity Transform, was aiming to solve this issue, however, seems like it was abandoned.

To stay updated, follow the RFC at https://github.com/vuejs/rfcs/discussions/503.

This was a good change. Evan has always been extremely good at putting his finger on the pulse of the frontend community. If there's a feature or paradigm that people love that would fit in Vue, Evan will incorporate it. Over the years, Vue has implemented (and sometimes later deprecated) dependency injection, JSX support, custom elements, Angular-style class components, Svelte-style ref sugar, and now Solid-inspired compiler optimizations. They even changed the order of a Vue file to match that of Svelte: first the script, then the template.

Now the $on has been removed, but the event subject is causing some confusion, see: https://github.com/vuejs/rfcs/discussions/397

The RFC has shown that this feature is very controversial, with lots of implications. Personally, I liked it at first, but now I'm against it.

Here is the Current language: https://github.com/vuejs/rfcs/blob/function-apis/active-rfcs/0000-function-api.md

Plus, even that there is a real possibility that the controversial Reactivity Transform RFC leads to a Vue 4 version, it is likely to bring just minor breaking changes from Vue 3.

The reactivity core, which is in https://github.com/solidjs/solid This is where you'll see the reactivity runtime implementation. Take note that Solid's reactivity doesn't rely on compile-time magic

I did try this but I'm not sure what you mean with the ssrLoadFrom. Is there any documentation on this, all I could find was the examples folder in solidjs: solid-ssr?

This is very true. I really hate svelte single file components. But then I tried JSX for breaking things down. I love solid but I don't feel really good about angle brackets within C style syntax. I saw this Scala library that stick with simple statically typed function syntax than html tags. I don't understand why people still wants to stick with xml like tags. In laminar markup is written like this scala div( h1("Hello world", color := "red"), inputCaption, input(inputMods, name := "fullName"), div( ">>", button("Submit"), "<<" ) ) I wish solid team makes their HyperScript syntax as performant as JSX.

What is Solid?

import logo from './logo.svg'; import styles from './App.module.css'; import 'flowbite'; function App() { return (

Edit src/App.jsx and save to reload.

Learn Solid, Tailwind CSS and Flowbite Toggle Flowbite modal

Terms of Service

svg> Close modal

With less than a month to go before the European Union enacts new consumer privacy laws for its citizens, companies around the world are updating their terms of service agreements to comply.

The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (G.D.P.R.) goes into effect on May 25 and is meant to ensure a common set of data rights in the European Union. It requires organizations to notify users as soon as possible of high-risk data breaches that could personally affect them.

I accept Decline

); } export default App;

There is example of each technique in Solid's main repo: https://github.com/solidjs/solid/tree/main/packages/solid-ssr/examples

I basically came up with an idea that is much like flutter's bloc pattern, and probably waht ryansolid was referring to in his reply to this issue when he said he made his own version of redux that codifies state changes instead of immutable state.

After seeing how inactive this sub was, I took it to Github: https://github.com/solidjs/solid/discussions/1440