very_good_coverage VS lint-action

Compare very_good_coverage vs lint-action and see what are their differences.

very_good_coverage

GitHub Action which helps enforce code coverage threshold using lcov created by Very Good Ventures 🦄 (by VeryGoodOpenSource)
Coverage coverage-threshold lcov github-action github-actions test-coverage
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

lint-action

✨ GitHub Action for detecting and auto-fixing lint errors (by wearerequired)
github-actions Linting Formatting CI code-style lint-action HacktoberFest Linter
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details
SurveyJS
Our great sponsors
  • SurveyJS - Open-Source JSON Form Builder to Create Dynamic Forms Right in Your App
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Our great sponsors
very_good_coverage lint-action
1 1
158 537
1.3% 1.9%
7.7 3.2
13 days ago 11 days ago
JavaScript JavaScript
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

very_good_coverage

Posts with mentions or reviews of very_good_coverage. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-29.

lint-action

Posts with mentions or reviews of lint-action. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-02-16.
  • Automate code formatting in Python
    3 projects | dev.to | 16 Feb 2021
    This workflow uses the same two steps as the previous one, that is checking out the repo and setting up Python. Then we install Pipenv and use that to install Black on the system. The lint-action action runs Black and then commits the changed files. This creates a new commit with the same changes that Black had shown in the diff!

What are some alternatives?

When comparing very_good_coverage and lint-action you can also consider the following projects:

CodeCoverageSummary - A GitHub Action that reads Cobertura format code coverage files and outputs a text or markdown summary.

action-electron-builder - :electron: GitHub Action for building and releasing Electron apps

coverde - A set of commands for coverage trace files manipulation.

cfn-lint-action - GitHub Action for interacting with CloudFormation Linter

node-coveralls - lcov posting to coveralls.io

github-activity-readme - Updates README with the recent GitHub activity of a user

blanket - blanket.js is a simple code coverage library for javascript. Designed to be easy to install and use, for both browser and nodejs.

vue-cleave-component - Vue.js component for Cleave.js input mask library :keyboard:

action-tmate - Debug your GitHub Actions via SSH by using tmate to get access to the runner system itself.

autohooks - Library for managing git hooks

Get-Email-Message-From-Branch-Action - Provides a well-formatted email subject and body using branch name used for Pull Request and other information obtained from the pull request.

dnscontrol-actions - Automate DNS updates and rollbacks across multiple providers using DNSControl and GitHub Actions.

very_good_coverage vs CodeCoverageSummary lint-action vs action-electron-builder very_good_coverage vs coverde lint-action vs cfn-lint-action very_good_coverage vs node-coveralls lint-action vs github-activity-readme very_good_coverage vs blanket lint-action vs vue-cleave-component very_good_coverage vs action-tmate lint-action vs autohooks very_good_coverage vs Get-Email-Message-From-Branch-Action very_good_coverage vs dnscontrol-actions