vaex
db-benchmark
Our great sponsors
vaex | db-benchmark | |
---|---|---|
7 | 91 | |
8,173 | 319 | |
0.4% | 0.9% | |
6.0 | 0.0 | |
20 days ago | 10 months ago | |
Python | R | |
MIT License | Mozilla Public License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
vaex
-
preprocessing millions of records - how to speed up the processing
Try vaex, vaex, using lazy evaluation and parallel calculations, you should be fine.
-
High performance (for the consumer) time series storage?
I'd recommend QuestDB. Worked with it multiple times for different algorithmic trading needs and it didn't disappoint. If you want to load data fast, I'd recommend this Python library.
-
Python Pandas vs Dask for csv file reading
How about vaex?
- Polars: Lightning-fast DataFrame library for Rust and Python
-
For stocks, what historical data do you store and how do you store it?
You might find vaex (https://github.com/vaexio/vaex) interesting if you work with HDF5.
- I wrote one of the fastest DataFrame libraries
-
A Hybrid Apache Arrow/Numpy DataFrame with Vaex Version 4.0
My guess is that should be possible, feel free to hop onto https://github.com/vaexio/vaex/discussions !
db-benchmark
- Database-Like Ops Benchmark
-
Polars
Real-world performance is complicated since data science covers a lot of use cases.
If you're just reading a small CSV to do analysis on it, then there will be no human-perceptible difference between Polars and Pandas. If you're reading a larger CSV with 100k rows, there still won't be much of a perceptible difference.
Per this (old) benchmark, there are differences once you get into 500MB+ territory: https://h2oai.github.io/db-benchmark/
-
DuckDB performance improvements with the latest release
I do think it was important for duckdb to put out a new version of the results as the earlier version of that benchmark [1] went dormant with a very old version of duckdb with very bad performance, especially against polars.
[1] https://h2oai.github.io/db-benchmark/
-
Show HN: SimSIMD vs. SciPy: How AVX-512 and SVE make SIMD cleaner and ML faster
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33270638 :
> Apache Ballista and Polars do Apache Arrow and SIMD.
> The Polars homepage links to the "Database-like ops benchmark" of {Polars, data.table, DataFrames.jl, ClickHouse, cuDF, spark, (py)datatable, dplyr, pandas, dask, Arrow, DuckDB, Modin,} but not yet PostgresML? https://h2oai.github.io/db-benchmark/ *
LLM -> Vector database: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_database
/? inurl:awesome site:github.com "vector database"
-
Pandas vs. Julia โ cheat sheet and comparison
I agree with your conclusion but want to add that switching from Julia may not make sense either.
According to these benchmarks: https://h2oai.github.io/db-benchmark/, DF.jl is the fastest library for some things, data.table for others, polars for others. Which is fastest depends on the query and whether it takes advantage of the features/properties of each.
For what it's worth, data.table is my favourite to use and I believe it has the nicest ergonomics of the three I spoke about.
-
Any faster Python alternatives?
Same. Numba does wonders for me in most scenarios. Yesterday I've discovered pola-rs and looks like I will add it to the stack. It's API is similar to pandas. Have a look at the benchmarks of cuDF, spark, dask, pandas compared to it: Benchmarks
-
Pandas 2.0 (with pyarrow) vs Pandas 1.3 - Performance comparison
The syntax has similarities with dplyr in terms of the way you chain operations, and itโs around an order of magnitude faster than pandas and dplyr (thereโs a nice benchmark here). Itโs also more memory-efficient and can handle larger-than-memory datasets via streaming if needed.
-
Pandas v2.0 Released
If interested in benchmarks comparing different dataframe implementations, here is one:
https://h2oai.github.io/db-benchmark/
- Database-like ops benchmark
-
Python "programmers" when I show them how much faster their naive code runs when translated to C++ (this is a joke, I love python)
Bad examples. Both numpy and pandas are notoriously un-optimized packages, losing handily to pretty much all their competitors (R, Julia, kdb+, vaex, polars). See https://h2oai.github.io/db-benchmark/ for a partial comparison.
What are some alternatives?
polars - Dataframes powered by a multithreaded, vectorized query engine, written in Rust
data.table - R's data.table package extends data.frame:
arrow-datafusion - Apache DataFusion SQL Query Engine
minimal-pandas-api-for-polars - pip install minimal-pandas-api-for-polars
Apache Arrow - Apache Arrow is a multi-language toolbox for accelerated data interchange and in-memory processing
rust-dataframe - A Rust DataFrame implementation, built on Apache Arrow
databend - ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฎ, ๐๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ & ๐๐. Modern alternative to Snowflake. Cost-effective and simple for massive-scale analytics. https://databend.com
visidata - A terminal spreadsheet multitool for discovering and arranging data
DataFramesMeta.jl - Metaprogramming tools for DataFrames
umap - Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection
sktime - A unified framework for machine learning with time series