V8
Duktape
Our great sponsors
V8 | Duktape | |
---|---|---|
55 | 10 | |
22,595 | 5,826 | |
0.9% | - | |
9.8 | 6.4 | |
5 days ago | 26 days ago | |
C++ | JavaScript | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
V8
-
Boehm Garbage Collector
https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git/+/HEAD/include/c...
Due to the nature of web engine workloads migrating objects to being GC'd isn't performance negative (as most people would expect). With care it can often end up performance positive.
There are a few tricks that Oilpan can apply. Concurrent tracing helps a lot (e.g. instead of incrementing/decrementing refs, you can trace on a different thread), in addition when destructing objects, the destructors typically become trivial meaning the object can just be dropped from memory. Both these free up main thread time. (The tradeoff with concurrent tracing is that you need atomic barriers when assigning pointers which needs care).
This is on top of the safey improvements you gain from being GC'd vs. smart pointers, etc.
One major tradeoff that UAF bugs become more difficult to fix, as you are just accessing objects which "should" be dead.
-
The Everything NPM Package
> If that standard library would be written in JS, a new browser (or rather a new JS engine being a part of the browser) could just use some existing implementation
That sounds great, but I'm doubtful of the simplicity behind this approach.
If my understanding is correct, v8 has transitioned to C++[0] and Torque[1] code to implement the standard library, as opposed to running hard-coded JavaScript on setting up a new context.
I suspect this decision was made as a performance optimization, as there would obviously be a non-zero cost to parsing arbitrary JavaScript. Therefore, I doubt a JavaScript-based standard library would be an acceptable solution here.
-
C++23: Removing garbage collection support
C++ lets you write anything you can imagine, and the language features and standard library often facilitate that. The committee espouses the view that they want to provide many "zero [runtime] cost," abstractions. Anybody can contribute to the language, although the committee process is often slow and can be political, each release the surface area and capability of the language gets larger.
I believe Hazard Pointers are slated for C++26, and these will add a form "free later, but not quite garbage collection" to the language. There was a talk this year about using hazard pointers to implement a much faster std::shared_ptr.
It's a language with incredible depth because so many different paradigms have been implemented in it, but also has many pitfalls for new and old users because there are many different ways of solving the same problem.
I feel that in C++, more than any other language, you need to know the actual implementation under the hood to use it effectively. This means knowing not just what the language specifies, but can occaissionally require knowing what GCC or Clang generate on your particular hardware.
Many garbage collected languages are written in or have parts of their implementations in C++. See JS (https://github.com/v8/v8)and Java GC (https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/tree/36de19d4622e38b6c00644b0...)
I am not an expert on Java (or C++), so if someone knows better or can add more please correct me.
-
Abstract Syntax Trees and Practical Applications in JavaScript
Remember that we earlier established that every source gets parsed into an AST at some point before it gets compiled or interpreted. For example, platforms like Nodejs and chromium-based browsers use Gooogle's V8 engine behind the scenes to run JavaScript and of course, some AST parsing is always involved before the interpreter kicks in. I looked V8's source and I discovered it uses its own internal parser to achieve this.
-
Notes: Advanced Node.js Concepts by Stephen Grider
In the source code of the Node.js opensource project, lib folder contains JavaScript code, mostly wrappers over C++ and function definitions. On the contrary, src folder contains C++ implementations of the functions, which pulls dependencies from the V8 project, the libuv project, the zlib project, the llhttp project, and many more - which are all placed at the deps folder.
-
What does the code look like for built-in functions?
Here is the implementation of of Array. prototype.map in V8. It's written in a language called Torque which appears to be a special language just for the v8 engine.
-
is there any resource for JavaScript that explain what kind of logic statement behind each function and why it's give this output and only accept this input etc... ?
It sounds like you want to know how JavaScript is implemented in the browser. The thing is, there is no universal implementation for JavaScript. JavaScript defines a specification that must be adhered to, and then each browser vendor can implement it in whatever way they see fit, as long as it does the specified things. For example (and I'm not saying this is the case) it's entirely possible for Chrome to implement Array.sort() using merge sort, while Firefox implements it as quick sort. You can try to find the source code for the implementation in a certain browser, but that will not be universal. I imagine you can find out how it works in Chrome somewhere in https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git, though I'm not sure exactly where.
- Minimize Heap Allocations in Node.js
-
[AskJS] Who first used the term "spread operator" re spread syntax ...?
chrome v8 commits referring to spread operator one of them: https://github.com/v8/v8/commit/93b3397e52d3faf38059718de335027e57b9690d
Duktape
- Roll your own JavaScript runtime, pt. 3
-
How to Create a Modern C Project with CMake and Conan
Im my projects I search for single file libs.(like https://github.com/svaarala/duktape etc...)
-
Libgrapheme: A simple freestanding C99 library for Unicode
You can also refer to the Unicode routines of other small JS engines[1,2], those don’t use ICU either, although the implementations are mercilessly size-optimized (to put it politely) and restricted to what the target JS version requires (e.g. casemapping but no normalization).
[1] https://github.com/bellard/quickjs/blob/master/libunicode.c
[2] https://github.com/svaarala/duktape/blob/master/src-input/du...
-
Nan Boxing
> memcpy from bytes to a NaN should work fine
Signaling NaNs are explicitly undefined in C11 F.2.1.: "This specification does not define the behavior of signaling NaNs." - and in practice may be "quieted" by conversion to Quiet NaNs, changing their bit patterns. Fast math optimization flags will also break the hell out of your code by assuming NaNs are impossible. I want to say there are more circumstances where optimizers and compiler generated code can butcher your NaN payloads, but I'd be working off recollected hearsay and I can't find a source, so don't quote me on that.
NaN boxing is common enough that, if you take the right precautions, a modern compiler should probably support it, maybe. NaN boxing is uncommon enough that, if your codebase needs to be sufficiently portable, you need an opt out for when it breaks. Let's review duktape's scars:
https://github.com/svaarala/duktape/blob/123d9426d5e5b36d5da...
https://github.com/svaarala/duktape/blob/5252b7a50611a3cb8bf...
https://github.com/svaarala/duktape/blob/224a0b89ca08a36e37e...
Note that "the right precautions" involve unions and proper integer types to avoid optimizer-invoked rewrites of the value and debugging when things go wrong, not simply YOLOing bytes into a double via memcpy. Note that debugging when it all goes terribly wrong can be quite painful. I've personally had the misfortune of being forced to debug duktape being built with fast math optimizatoins enabled on one "rare" platform + build configuration that wasn't caught by duktape's #if defined(__FAST_MATH__) checks linked above (wasn't Clang nor GCC, so go figure it didn't make the same #define)
-
YouTube-dl has a JavaScript interpreter written in 870 lines of Python
I was expecting this to be about Duktape <https://github.com/svaarala/duktape>, but heh, for sure no. I'd bet $1 there's no way youtube-dl would switch, but I wonder if yt-dlp would?
-
[AskJS] Do you use JavaScript on Microcontrollers? Which engine / interpreter?
- Duktape (4.8k stars)
What are some alternatives?
quickjs - Public repository of the QuickJS Javascript Engine.
Lua - Lua is a powerful, efficient, lightweight, embeddable scripting language. It supports procedural programming, object-oriented programming, functional programming, data-driven programming, and data description.
ChakraCore - ChakraCore is an open source Javascript engine with a C API. [Moved to: https://github.com/chakra-core/ChakraCore]
jerryscript - Ultra-lightweight JavaScript engine for the Internet of Things.
V7 - Embedded JavaScript engine for C/C++
ChaiScript - Embedded Scripting Language Designed for C++
Cython - The most widely used Python to C compiler
SWIG - SWIG is a software development tool that connects programs written in C and C++ with a variety of high-level programming languages.
Flutter - Flutter makes it easy and fast to build beautiful apps for mobile and beyond