µPickle
jsoniter-scala
Our great sponsors
µPickle | jsoniter-scala | |
---|---|---|
4 | 29 | |
693 | 706 | |
0.7% | - | |
6.7 | 9.6 | |
8 days ago | 1 day ago | |
Scala | Scala | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
µPickle
-
Why does Scala seem to be slow at benchmark results?
The upickle library has traditionally had great performance for handling json in Scala apps so is likely to be seen as a safe choice for someone starting a Scala project. It appears though that not just upickle, but other json library projects are having difficulties maintaining their old level of performance when they release using Scala 3's macros. uPickle currently has an open issue where you can see some of these issues: https://github.com/com-lihaoyi/upickle/issues/389 and here you can see the weePickle folks are also having the same performance problems. Looks like things changed up significantly enough between Scala 2 and Scala 3 so that in order to maintain the same functionality they have resorted to using runtime reflection for mapping to/from case classes.
- Preparing for uPickle 2.0.0
-
Updated benchmark results of JSON parsers for Scala - now with results for circe and play-json boosters based on jsoniter-scala.
See here for sample code size numbers (not picking on upickle specifically, it's just what I'm using myself. I've heard similar reports about e.g. circe)
-
[help] Trouble with derivation and generics
A good starting point is the note in MacroImplicits.scala in upickle sources. "derives Writer" for a specific case class Foo simply adds a given Writer[Foo] to a companion object of the same specific class. However, this cannot be done automatically for a trait defining sum type - in this case trait Thing. The required given must be defined manually, and the ones automatically obtained for case classes can be used in it.
jsoniter-scala
-
1BRC Merykitty's Magic SWAR: 8 Lines of Code Explained in 3k Words
What an amazing step by step explanation!
More than 2 years ago I found that byte array view var handles are quite suitable to cook efficient SWAR routines with Java/Scala.
See a lot of other examples of SWAR usage, like parsing Base16/64 string, java.time.* and number values directly from byte arrays:
https://github.com/plokhotnyuk/jsoniter-scala/blob/master/js...
-
The Newest Java Json Benchmark Results just dropped
Afaik dsl-json came up with a lot of improvements and inspired a several other libraries like JsonIter and jsonIter-scala. Jsoniter-scala by u/plokhotnyuk is probably the most optimized JSON library on the JVM at this point, and seems to power most of the Scala ecosystem. Some implementations/optimizations eventually made their way back into Jackson and other libraries.
-
Please try my JSON library
I was on your place more then 5 years ago, when cut the 1st release of jsoniter-scala.
-
Post your problems with Scala 3/2.13 compiler performance!
I've just increased compiler performance in ~1.5x times by adding these JVM options for the code cache
-
smithy-translate : a CLI tool to turn openapi specs and json-schema specs into smithy specs, written in Scala
We have our own open-source code-generator that produces Scala code from Smithy. The code module is entirely dependency-free, and the generated code is not biased towards any library, be that http or json. We do however have out-of-the-box integration with jsoniter and http4s.
-
Why does Scala seem to be slow at benchmark results?
You can use jsoniter-scala. It is easy to use like upickle.
-
Scala needs *highly* efficient libraries to survive in a multi-core age
BTW, jsoniter-scala uses it for faster parsing and serialization using SWAR techniques, like here.
-
Using Circe with GADT
Probably you should have both codecs (for Foo and for its T) are implicitly available in the scope, like it is done in the following test for jsoniter-scala:
-
Starting with scala
BEWARE: uJson is vulnerable under DoS attacks
-
Is Scala a good choice for a data intensive web backend?
Please see sources (and GitHub history of development) of jsoniter-scala as an example in the domain of JSON parsing and serialization.
What are some alternatives?
ScalaPB - Protocol buffer compiler for Scala.
circe - Yet another JSON library for Scala
msgpack - MessagePack serializer implementation for Scala / msgpack.org[Scala]
json4s - JSON library
Pickling
DSL-JSON - High performance JVM JSON library
scodec - Scala combinator library for working with binary data
jackson-module-scala - Add-on module for Jackson (https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson) to support Scala-specific datatypes
Scrooge - A Thrift parser/generator
Play JSON - The Play JSON library
validation
spray-json - A lightweight, clean and simple JSON implementation in Scala